Saga of Polarity

[Bring4th_Austin]

Ra says that creation is cyclical in nature (or they assume so), so when a cycle ends and the creator is One, what would be the point of splitting apart again if all of this knowledge were already known to the One?

I'd say that it splits apart in our 'time'. Our 'time' is durational, linear, causal, or sequenced. And our 'knowledge' is constructed from this same 3D-mechanical limitation. But this is necessarily very different than an overview of time that is not subject to the limitations of event sequencing.

I'm having a hard time rectifying the idea of a creation which is not in a sense "event sequenced" when we learn it is "cyclical in nature" and each cycle draws upon the experience before it. I mean, I understand that everything is happening simultaneously, but the nature of creation as described by Ra doesn't seem to sit right with that. Did they describe it as "cyclical" to dumb it down for 3D understanding? Did they say "periodically coalesces and again begins" just to help us understand?

How can something be cyclical, periodical, and begin again when there is nothing but simultaneity?

Getting back to the base question, was the STS polarity an acknowledged potential before it actually happened? Did the Logos which contained the first STS entity know that STS was possible, or more specifically, was it planned by that Logos?

My understanding is that this is the design happening simultaneously with the designers idea. We have all of this space to appreciate its many facets and in so doing we co-create that experience. We don't experience it 'after the fact'.

Then how are things "planned" or "not planned" by the Logos based on Ra's description? Ra describes it as the Logos having a basic plan, but then within that plan there are things that happen that are "unplanned," such as the formation of social memory complexes, the heating effect of our 3D to 4D transition, and the type of warfare we experience. These things are "unplanned" by the Logos according to Ra, but we experience them anyways. The description doesn't seem to fit with the idea of a "design happening simultaneously with the designer's idea," because if they were the designer's idea then it wouldn't be "unplanned."

Just wondering why you thought green ray was a way to contact intelligent infinity. We are talking about 3D to 4D transition, correct? Apparently, its somewhat conscious use via STO choice merely makes one harvestable to green-ray environment. On the other hand, the 95% STS entity will indeed use intelligent infinity (as a requirement) for harvest. So there is a big difference in mechanics and I think it's a mistake to not only say steps are skipped but that the G2II is opened the same way with green.

This is off-topic so I won't go further into it, but I just double checked my understanding with the various Ra references and I have a pretty solid understanding of what I'm trying to communicate, maybe I'm just not communicating it very well.