06-30-2011, 06:47 PM
Certainly! We know that a Logos is:
Here we have Ra's definition of The Creator as the focusing of infinity. This means that The Creator in fact is only a FUNCTION. Which means that the choices and concepts which derive from the function are not known to the function. It is simply using the light at its disposal, it is not "manufacturing" the light. Perhaps the "local" Logos truly did not know that STS would occur when it started because it started without full consciousness. The Logos determines the paths, but it is like a farmer crafting a irrigating system. They can set all the courses and know what is needed to be done in order to produce the crops but the actual process as it happens is always subject to nature. Just as a teacher cannot force lessons on to a student, but instead only coax them to learn by their own choice.
First density starts with CONSCIOUSNESS, rather, the development of consciousness, which means that "Logos" is in fact only referring to the focusing of Light. It is the Co-Creators who direct the Logos! When Ra refers to a "Logos" it is not referring to any type of personality, it is referring to an energetic principle of Love, or Creation. A very good question is... who or what was the first co-creator? If Logos is the principle of Creation, that means Logos is in fact only something to be USED.
SO how about we consider STS as a function of Love? Kabbalah has made this incredibly clear for me. The Creator created the Creature (Creation) in its image, meaning its reflection. The Creator is that which bestows, and the Creature is that which Receives. The Creature admired the Creator and wanted to be like it, so it went against its nature and stop receiving and instead focused only on the attribute of bestowal. However, this wasn't what the Creator wanted, the Creature would no longer accept its love, since the Creature felt that it was "better" to be exactly like the Creator. The path of STS is marked most notably by its lack of acceptance, especially of any sort of external force or assistance. Any external assistance received will be justified by one's own sense of authority and power, that the assistance was "commanded".
However, we should not assume this was done out of hatred or negativity, the path to STS came out of a Love for giving of the self and a belief that to be solely a giver and to receive nothing is "better" than the natural harmony between Creator and Creature. Negativity is really just confused positivity! We could almost call it a Logos self-esteem issue.
Ah, and in reference to what ABTF and 111 just said, perhaps infinity is potential, but intelligent infinity is activated infinity! The Creator is the very process of potential becoming active and then returning, then activating, then potentiating again, etc.
This we know because "focus" is that which gives direction, which means intelligent infinity is that which developed to direct the principles of motion (mover and moved) that developed in the last octave.
Quote:Ra: I am Ra. Awareness led to the focus of infinity into infinite energy. You have called this by various vibrational sound complexes, the most common to your ears being “Logos” or “Love.” The Creator is the focusing of infinity as an aware or conscious principle called by us as closely as we can create understanding/learning in your language, intelligent infinity.
Here we have Ra's definition of The Creator as the focusing of infinity. This means that The Creator in fact is only a FUNCTION. Which means that the choices and concepts which derive from the function are not known to the function. It is simply using the light at its disposal, it is not "manufacturing" the light. Perhaps the "local" Logos truly did not know that STS would occur when it started because it started without full consciousness. The Logos determines the paths, but it is like a farmer crafting a irrigating system. They can set all the courses and know what is needed to be done in order to produce the crops but the actual process as it happens is always subject to nature. Just as a teacher cannot force lessons on to a student, but instead only coax them to learn by their own choice.
Quote:Quote:Consider and remember the discussion of the Logos. With the primal distortion of free will, each galaxy developed its own Logos. This Logos has complete free will in determining the paths of intelligent energy which promote the lessons of each of the densities given the conditions of the planetary spheres and the sun bodies.Ra: I am Ra. Each step recapitulates intelligent infinity in its discovery of awareness. In a planetary environment all begins in what you would call chaos, energy undirected and random in its infinity. Slowly, in your terms of understanding, there forms a focus of self-awareness. Thus the Logos moves. Light comes to form the darkness, according to the co-Creator’s patterns and vibratory rhythms, so constructing a certain type of experience. This begins with first density which is the density of consciousness, the mineral and water life upon the planet learning from fire and wind the awareness of being. This is the first density.
First density starts with CONSCIOUSNESS, rather, the development of consciousness, which means that "Logos" is in fact only referring to the focusing of Light. It is the Co-Creators who direct the Logos! When Ra refers to a "Logos" it is not referring to any type of personality, it is referring to an energetic principle of Love, or Creation. A very good question is... who or what was the first co-creator? If Logos is the principle of Creation, that means Logos is in fact only something to be USED.
SO how about we consider STS as a function of Love? Kabbalah has made this incredibly clear for me. The Creator created the Creature (Creation) in its image, meaning its reflection. The Creator is that which bestows, and the Creature is that which Receives. The Creature admired the Creator and wanted to be like it, so it went against its nature and stop receiving and instead focused only on the attribute of bestowal. However, this wasn't what the Creator wanted, the Creature would no longer accept its love, since the Creature felt that it was "better" to be exactly like the Creator. The path of STS is marked most notably by its lack of acceptance, especially of any sort of external force or assistance. Any external assistance received will be justified by one's own sense of authority and power, that the assistance was "commanded".
However, we should not assume this was done out of hatred or negativity, the path to STS came out of a Love for giving of the self and a belief that to be solely a giver and to receive nothing is "better" than the natural harmony between Creator and Creature. Negativity is really just confused positivity! We could almost call it a Logos self-esteem issue.
Ah, and in reference to what ABTF and 111 just said, perhaps infinity is potential, but intelligent infinity is activated infinity! The Creator is the very process of potential becoming active and then returning, then activating, then potentiating again, etc.
This we know because "focus" is that which gives direction, which means intelligent infinity is that which developed to direct the principles of motion (mover and moved) that developed in the last octave.