Undestanding domination/submission and its reciprocal - indigo blockage

[unity100]

I see what you mean. I should have used better words, I don't actually think about dominance and submission during intercourse. I was relating dominance and submission to the nature of sex and how it is different for the male and female. More along the lines of this Ra quote:

Due to the veiling process the energy transferred from male to female is different than that transferred from female to male. Due to the polarity difference of the mind/body/spirit complexes of male and female the male stores physical energy, the female mental and mental/emotional energy. When third-density sexual energy transfer is completed the male will have offered the discharge of physical energy. The female is, thereby, refreshed, having far less physical vitality. At the same time, if you will use this term, the female discharges the efflux of its stored mental and mental/emotional energy, thereby offering inspiration, healing, and blessing to the male which by nature is less vital in this area.

I appreciate the release of stored physical energy and I take in return inspiration from her mental/emotional energy. There definitely isn't any blockage in that area. But I know that from this binding that she, in a way, dominates me mentally since I receive her mental/emotional energy. I'm no longer just thinking about my self.

I enjoy and accept this. I'm just trying to apply this becoming 'one flesh, one mind' thing to every thing else, if at all possible.

then it seems like you confused domination/submission with physical - mental/emotional.

in sexual interaction, these energies are given in between male and female. it is a mutually participated affair, and, in conjunction :

In my personal and humble opinion, I feel like you are applying the ideas of domination and submission to the concepts of offering and acceptance. I'm not going to suggest to you any certain way to define things, but it might be worthy for you to contemplate your view of the male/female, giving/receiving, moving/moved energies as domination/submission.

I personally do not find it serves me to view respect/acceptance as submission, or creation/will as domination. Not saying that domination and submission should be dismissed as part of self and Creation, but to me they hold very specific definitions and energy patterns.

it would be incorrect to see the exchange in between male and female as 'offering/accepting', translated into sex roles - in the interaction, the male seem to be physically giving (physical energy), yet, the male is also receiving (emotional/mental energy). therefore, this is a two way affair.

moreover, male/female is a balance that exists in all individuals - no male is actually solely male, no female is actually solely female. everyone is slanted to either side per their balance. (this excludes the entities which are perfectly balanced in male/female regard, however they are probably rare).

in addition, entities' balance may change depending on conditions and time, and may not be the same from point to point.

...........

so, sex is an exchange in between two entities which may be in any balance point in regard to male/female at any given point in time and space. trying to typecast roles into sex, is rather wrong, especially for wanderers or entities who are of higher vibration (they have more balance than the average). forcing some balance in lieu of existing one, will probably not facilitate the high-vibration energy exchange.

therefore,

sex is something that should be treated as a song, a poem which two entities recite. the interaction should be in lines of a dance with full acceptance, and roles should not be typecast into the merger. it should flow like a river, or a dance.