Is meditation a STS act?

[zenmaster]

also, to no love yourself, is being STS

STS and STO refer to orientations of polarity. The word 'love' is where the confusion lies. 'Love' is the 'logos'. It is a form of acceptance of the logos- the more acceptance, the more polarity. There are acts without polarity, that is - without acceptance and these have no orientation - neither STS or STO. They are based on fear, distraction, ignorance, misunderstandings, non-acceptance. So to not love oneself is absolutely not being 'STS'.

"Again we reach semantic difficulties. The vibration or density of love or understanding is not a term used in the same sense as the second distortion, Love..."

It may not be accurate to say that "to no love yourself, is being STS" but it is accurate (in the green-ray sense of love) to say that service-to-self entities do not love themselves.

I agree with this, since obviously green-ray acceptance is absent in polarized STS entities.

But again, lack of love of self is still not necessarily STS, even if it's lack of 'green ray'. There is no 'STS' without sufficient polarity. And that polarity is rare. You can't 'love' what you have not yet individuated from the logos. Absence of love, any type of love, is obviously not necessarily STS. That is not a semantic issue.

Further, most people are not capable of green-ray love. So you would call them STS? No, I don't think so.