07-20-2011, 09:36 PM
My two cents...
I imagine that the information as to who was or was not sixth-density negative in our history could be harmful for more than a few reasons, but foremost in my mind would be that those who happen to be privy to our actual history (more than a little negative influence among those individuals) would notice, realize that the contact was giving out information detrimental to their cause, and target the group. Defense from disincarnate STS entities is one thing. Defense from incarnate STS is quite another.
Regarding Muhammed: if you read the Quran closely, you may notice that there are at least two contacts. One does not reference itself very much, if at all and only talks about the Creator; the other constantly refers to itself using the odd pronoun "ourself" and speaks as if it were Allah. Guess which one is responsible for all the surahs that advocate killing infidels, disciplining your wife, owning slaves, etc?
So I believe that Muhammed was technically positive, but opened himself up to negative information, mixed with the positive, that talked him into adopting conquest as a valid methodology.
I imagine that the information as to who was or was not sixth-density negative in our history could be harmful for more than a few reasons, but foremost in my mind would be that those who happen to be privy to our actual history (more than a little negative influence among those individuals) would notice, realize that the contact was giving out information detrimental to their cause, and target the group. Defense from disincarnate STS entities is one thing. Defense from incarnate STS is quite another.
Regarding Muhammed: if you read the Quran closely, you may notice that there are at least two contacts. One does not reference itself very much, if at all and only talks about the Creator; the other constantly refers to itself using the odd pronoun "ourself" and speaks as if it were Allah. Guess which one is responsible for all the surahs that advocate killing infidels, disciplining your wife, owning slaves, etc?
So I believe that Muhammed was technically positive, but opened himself up to negative information, mixed with the positive, that talked him into adopting conquest as a valid methodology.