(07-19-2011, 10:47 PM)unity100 Wrote: judging from his life and his material, mohammad seems to be one.
I have personally checked into mohammed, then asked a lot of others to double check my findings. He was an actual prophet and the book does not portray his teachings very well.
I must also mention that I only checked into it looking first at "what" he had communicated with. My first thoughts were negative beings. It appears that my personal bias was completely off on this individual, and we are at the mercy of subsequent manipulations of what he attempted to teach.
Ok to give you guys a better understanding, think of what would happen after this group involved with the LOO had all passed away and the govt took possession of the transcripts, modified them, then released them back out into the public. This is what has happened to every religious text out there. It only takes a couple of generations to forget an incident even happened.