Rapid Polarization (vis-a-vis the power to abstract)

[3D Sunset]

Hi Ho Q!

Welcome back. What an interesting course you've laid in which you ask us to indulge. Let's sample some of your offerings:

We presumably had an abundance of peace and agreement in space/time verses this time/space.

This may be off topic, but I'm a little confused by your choice of the juxtaposition of s/t and t/s in this reference. It would seem to me that the abundance of peace was in t/s prior to our veiled incarnation in this s/t. Did I miss your point here, or simply detect a trivial typo? (If the latter, please forgive my pointing it out.)

Its why we're not there and instead chose here. Its for the eggs. We're here for the getting of eggs as it were. 3D requires the getting of eggs through this arduous process. Those that have the stones to engage prosper the greater for it. Those that do not don't eat as well. That's 3D. To believe otherwise is unrealistic in 3D. To believe otherwise indeed may retard ones growth in 3D.

Gathering of eggs. An interesting analogy. I am stuck with images of us all running around with Easter baskets looking for the festive ova. Is one of them perhaps golden? But wait! Gathering Easter eggs is not arduous, do our explorations in 3D really need to be? Is this not a labor of love and exploration of our many subtle, fascinating facets?

I therefore strongly suggest that disagreement, challenge, and exploration through inquiry is a prerequisite for those more inclined to abstract, which is equally a powerful prerequisite for spiritual growth and rapid polarization as given by Ra. There are no exceptions. Without intellectual challenging in 3D, all remains flat, textureless and gray verses full of the ridges and bumps and color and hue of a non-flat-kaleidoscopic-non-gray-scape. Abstractly challenging is more than simply a philosophical predilection in 3D.

I quite agree that use of the intellect is necessary for polarization. I would even grant that it is beneficial for more rapid polarization. But Ra clearly indicates that a balance between intuition and rationalization is the path toward illumination. Let us not cut off the left arm, simply because we favor the right!

...for without the acceptance by the rational mind of the worth of the intuitive faculty the creative aspects which aid in illumination will be stifled.

So the rational mind must be fed by the intuitive. I believe that this is another critical aspect of Ra's recipe for polarization (be it rapid or not).

AND ALL ALONG WE WERE TAUGHT THAT WE WEREN'T SUPPOSED TO EAT OF THE TREE? AND WHY WAS THAT? IT WAS NEVER CHALLENGED!

Not to quibble about interpretations of Biblical quotes, but I read this passage slightly differently. As I see it, there were actually two trees in the Garden of Eden: The Tree of Knowledge and the Tree of Life. God instructed Adam and Eve not to eat of the fruit of the tree of knowledge (of good and evil). He actually never gave them directions regarding the Tree of Life. God was conveniently mute on this topic, because it was not pertinent until after they had eaten of the tree of Knowledge. Only then, when their world changed from monochromatic to dichromatic (or should I say dichotomatic), was it important that they be separated from tree of Life and hence exiled from the garden of Eden.

Taking now, this literal interpretation and moving it to figurative, we can see that given the knowledge of good and evil, it would now be necessary for humankind to transcend this knowledge in order to be allowed to return to the Garden of Eden and partake of the Tree of Life. That is to say that once separation was known, then it must be transcended (not overcome, mind you, but transcended) in order to realize sufficient oneness with the Creator to allow further evolution without the perception of death. Note that death is only viewed as mysterious when living within the rather strict confines of the veil, which exists only in the presence of free will granted to a 3D entity.

1. Are there any other such pearls in the LOO literature that specifically point a finger towards Rapid Polarization?
2. What may we do to increase this polarization for ourselves other than to daily challenge ones own thoughts, as much as all others (as seen in the scripture examples above).
3. What may we do for others to invite them into same?

Although I admire the spirit, vim and vigor with which you are tossing yourself head-first into this cause, I am drawn back to my image of us all wearing our Sunday best scampering after Easter Eggs. More importantly though, I am drawn to the memory of my eldest daughter's experiences with such hunts. She invariably came back with the fewest eggs, by a far count, not because she was slower, or less clever than the others. Rather she came back with many fewer because she so enjoyed the hunt! She would meticulously examine each egg that she found and carefully consider where to place it her basket and then where she would look next. She would spot many eggs while standing as others ran willy nilly grabbing them as fast as possible. At the end of the hunt, she may have had fewer eggs, but I know that she had a much richer experience of the hunt. And ultimately, it is the experience that we bring back as our gifts to the One Creator, not the eggs.

Is rapid polarization important? It would seem so, especially given the fact that our 3D light is waning and the time to choose is passing. Let me try to dig into your head a little here Q, and see if I can better reveal your motivation (again, please forgive my putting words in your mouth, I trust that you will correct me if I stray too far from your reasoning):

- For those that are not yet harvestable, it does not seem that rational debate about the details and implications of the Law of One is really feasible, given that they are mostly asleep and trying to broadcast such knowledge would be expensive, time consuming, largely unproductive and most importantly prone to infringe upon their free will.

So, we are left with those people that are already aware of the Law of One and either have or have not polarized sufficiently to be harvested. Let's look at both of these for a moment.

- Clearly, rapid polarization should be important to those who are not yet harvestable, or to those who are not sure whether or not they are harvestable. It would seem to me that this last sub-category in particular, includes many of the members of this forum.

- Now, what about those that are confident in their harvestabilty. To what end is more rapid and thus greater polarization important to them? Well, many of these are wanderers who are here to aid in Harvest, but they are also here to further their own polarization as can be done so much more efficiently within 3D. It would seem that this group includes the rest of the members of this forum (i.e., those not included immediately above).

So, I think I can see where you're heading with this effort. In essence you are making a call for those that wish to participate in efforts that can rapidly increase their polarization during the growing dusk of Earth's 3D existence. Am I on target here, dear friend?

I agree that there is much that can be done as the light grows dim and we silently contemplate Earth's beautiful

3D Sunset

"The woods are lovely, dark and deep. But I have promises to keep. And miles to go before I sleep."