08-07-2011, 04:47 AM
(08-05-2011, 06:16 PM)turtledude23 Wrote:(08-05-2011, 04:04 AM)unity100 Wrote:Do you mean the Ra quote was referring to 6D negative entities who didn't want to integrate into 6D positive and chose to wander to 3D to further polarize to STS? I don't think there would be many such entities, it would be foolish to do that, they'd just end up back in the same place eventually, surely a wise entity like that would know better.(08-04-2011, 04:48 PM)turtledude23 Wrote:(08-04-2011, 01:17 PM)Icaro Wrote:I think the reason Ra with held that information was because a large portion of the wanderers on Earth now are likely formerly of the negative path, meaning the person who's reading that could be one or someone they know could be. If you knew someone on Earth right now who used to be 5D negative your perception of them would change regardless of how mature your beliefs about STS are.I'm sure negative wanderers mask as positive figures, so I imagine Ra didn't want to cause confusion.
an entity formerly on the negative path would be either nonpolarized or positive path. therefore they wouldnt be negative 6d wanderers.
its naming.
you cannot name an entity which has switched to positive path, and incarnated, 'a negative wanderer' the entity is a positive wanderer.