08-17-2011, 11:51 PM
What is the difference between the actuality of their effects and the actuality of their existence? Also, you are somewhat missing my point. Your doubt has already prevented the effectiveness of the asking before you have even made the attempt. The fact that you did it "to amuse" me shows that you held no true formal intention.
Ah, your body is the actualized form of your spirit! The image of fire is the actualized form of the heat, the flashlight is the actualized form of the mechanism of light. Light and heat themselves are still beyond your perception in "actuality".
I would suggest you to examine the alchemical concept of Symbols and the way all we see is a symbol. Nothing we see is "whole", because we do not perceive the mechanism, we do not perceive all the parts of anything, only the final image perception.
Also, once again you are only referencing EFFECTS. You are feeling the effects of the wind or air, you are experiencing the effect of the light, but you are in no way "actually" perceiving these things themselves.
Ah, your body is the actualized form of your spirit! The image of fire is the actualized form of the heat, the flashlight is the actualized form of the mechanism of light. Light and heat themselves are still beyond your perception in "actuality".
I would suggest you to examine the alchemical concept of Symbols and the way all we see is a symbol. Nothing we see is "whole", because we do not perceive the mechanism, we do not perceive all the parts of anything, only the final image perception.
Also, once again you are only referencing EFFECTS. You are feeling the effects of the wind or air, you are experiencing the effect of the light, but you are in no way "actually" perceiving these things themselves.