'Controversial' study about possible ETI contact scenarios

[SomaticDreams]

Most people's ideas of ETI, including these researchers, already exist in popular media. You simply can't reach beyond your current level of consciousness to an appreciable extent. Especially to come back and explain it in conventional context. Game over. "experience in fourth density is emphatically not the same as third-density experience."

I'm not sure what exactly this thread is discussing....but.... are you suggesting fourth density and extra terrestrials are synonymous ?

This thread is just about this study and any thoughts on it. Zenmaster is saying that it's useless to utilize constructs from third density to explain fourth density. ETI would be 4D, in the context of this discussion (Zoo hypothesis), since they are able to materialize and dematerialize into our density. I would not say they are "synonymous".

Essentially zenmaster is saying this study is useless in terms of further understanding the LOO material or anything to do with ETI's (as most people have already exhausted 3d concepts about aliens when studying them).

I think it's still useful in terms of understanding what most people will think when there is a disclosure of aliens around the world, and then also how to become a 'beacon of light', being a wanderer... In Buddhism there is a concept of "skillful means", meaning you have to be skillful in order to explain the Dharma to each person. It's never the same. I think the same applies for the LOO material, understanding the 3d distortions of ETI's will help us only further serve as beacons of light, and therefore shed light upon ourselves and others.

Also 3d, I really enjoy your humor on this board. I get a kick out of all of your posts!