08-24-2011, 09:50 PM
Time? It is one of the most difficult factors to fathom. (thus the thread)
I don't know. Here is something I don't like in relation to that paper: the it is a "given" that the past in unchangeable and the future is simply the laid out series of 'nows'. I think they would get better results if they simply too the past and the future as both completely unknown. I don't think it is possible to proof that the past hasn't changed or that it ever was. It's easy to see the future this way, but, IMO, they disservice themselves by not looking at the past in the same way
I don't know. Here is something I don't like in relation to that paper: the it is a "given" that the past in unchangeable and the future is simply the laid out series of 'nows'. I think they would get better results if they simply too the past and the future as both completely unknown. I don't think it is possible to proof that the past hasn't changed or that it ever was. It's easy to see the future this way, but, IMO, they disservice themselves by not looking at the past in the same way
![[+]](https://www.bring4th.org/forums/images/collapse_collapsed.png)