(09-05-2011, 04:18 PM)Icaro Wrote: There is no point in debating this with Unity in this thread. I suggest refraining from doing so as it will only take the thread in the entirely opposite direction. If my original post can't spark anything, his opinion is set.
please. at least, be reasonable in your statements.
in your last thread, you have gone the way of trying to replace the concept 'i believe' to flat out describe a situation in which propositions were contradictory to the plain information given in the material with 'intuition informing intelligence'.
in this topic, it has gone even further - now, you are basically invalidating what Ra HAS directly said, with what Ra has NOT said at all. even to the point of claiming negative interference in the material -> despite Ra had had informed of such situations AFTER they have occurred, like the case with the psychic attack that happened to Carla in another, totally irrelevant channeling session.
in such a position you cant rationally tell me that my mind is set. every other day you add to the steps/workarounds you go into for denying the possibility of a sudden scenario. it has gone over what, now, 8 steps ? i would again include them here, but i think you are being offended by that. still one wonders why you are spending that much effort for denying even plain, direct information in a material you seemingly trust, and then being offended by observations to that end.
as i said, you are basically taking what Ra has not said, to invalidate what they have said.
not to mention that you have based an ENTIRE post on a grand misstatement and misperception like the below :
Quote:The statement above is invariably the be all end all statement that people rely on supporting that the harvest is instant, as opposed to occurring naturally upon normal death.
no, it wasnt. 17.29 is not the quote on which instant harvest propositions rely or hinge upon. there were numerous other information and quote given in the previous 3 threads you participated in that subject. so many that i wont even at all bother to include them here.
yet you ignored ALL of them, and spent that effort to invalidate one single plain q/a, by going to the extent of claiming negative influence in 'publishing' of the material and invalidating what Ra says with what they dont say.
i am asking you, where all the q/as, information, pointers more than one people shared in three separate threads, have gone, while you were making this thread ? why have you ignored them ?