The Detuning of Session 17 and Ra's True Intentions Regarding 2011 - Part II

[βαθμιαίος]

In any case, we are left here with a response to a direct question about harvest being in 2011. As I have emphatically argued- it should be reasonably assumed that such a grave error in understanding on Don's part would have been corrected by Ra. Otherwise, we should assume that Don was correct in his framing of the query. The third option is as forwarded here by Icaro- that there was interference during the transmission. Are there other options that you see here that I am overlooking?

One possibility (not sure if this is one of your three) is that harvest will be in 2011. Another possibility would be that Ra was wrong, that harvest won't be in 2011. Another possibility could be that Ra was right in 1981 but that the timeline has shifted and harvest won't actually be in 2011. I don't see the need to invoke a negative entity to corrupt that answer. As unity100 points out, that approach can be used to invalidate any answer.

Also, I would be interested to hear in more detail- in terms of your understanding of the channeling process- why you feel so strongly that the contact could not have been corrupted. According to my own theoretical knowledge, and experience with such things, no form of protection is "foolproof".

This was trance channeling with rigorous protection. Carla left her body and Ra used it. A couple of times Ra asked that the circle of light be rewalked and the breath of righteousness expelled to drive away negative thoughtforms. Other times, as unity100 has pointed out, Ra corrected mistakes they had made. In session 17 Ra did neither of those things. I feel confident that if the session had been infringed upon, Ra would have alerted L/L. If we say session 17 was corrupted aren't we, by implication, impugning all the remaining sessions, given that Ra never gave any indications that there had been problems in session 17?