09-08-2009, 03:23 PM
Lorna 
Thank you for the information on bluebeam. I haven't had the time to do more than scan the page, but I added it to my todo links. I definitely need a refresher course 
Lavazza, it was my pleasure to share what I know. (You know me :-P ) I don't follow blossoms channeling. I read it around august last year for some reason but I couldn't find much more than a few feel good vibes. She's a nice person. I had the impression of her being in it for the money, but after checking all the facts I had to take that back. I think she believed it as well. I believe she's a good person. So I mostly feel compassion for her. I'm not so sure about her sources. To do this to her is pretty nasty. The claim that they could not predict the human response in advance seems to me rather naive because I certainly could.
As for your spreadsheet, I'm formally trained in statistics and methodology, if there's anything you want to do with the information I'll be more than willing to lend a hand. However I'm a little worried that since all the predictions are different in probability we can't really do more than describe the figures. (Some predictions are more likely than others) But the exact date matches seem impossible enough to just speak for themselves. Also I've seen comparisons like this before, and over 50% accuracy is impressive even among good psychics. I mean it's a shame he's not on the web Maybe you should drag him here by his ears Maybe not. But it's a nice thought
Thank you for the information on bluebeam. I haven't had the time to do more than scan the page, but I added it to my todo links. I definitely need a refresher course Lavazza, it was my pleasure to share what I know. (You know me :-P ) I don't follow blossoms channeling. I read it around august last year for some reason but I couldn't find much more than a few feel good vibes. She's a nice person. I had the impression of her being in it for the money, but after checking all the facts I had to take that back. I think she believed it as well. I believe she's a good person. So I mostly feel compassion for her. I'm not so sure about her sources. To do this to her is pretty nasty. The claim that they could not predict the human response in advance seems to me rather naive because I certainly could.
As for your spreadsheet, I'm formally trained in statistics and methodology, if there's anything you want to do with the information I'll be more than willing to lend a hand. However I'm a little worried that since all the predictions are different in probability we can't really do more than describe the figures. (Some predictions are more likely than others) But the exact date matches seem impossible enough to just speak for themselves. Also I've seen comparisons like this before, and over 50% accuracy is impressive even among good psychics. I mean it's a shame he's not on the web
Maybe you should drag him here by his ears Maybe not. But it's a nice thought