Bring4th Forums
  • Login Register
    Login
    Username:
    Password:
  • Archive Home
  • Members
  • Team
  • Help
  • More
    • About Us
    • Library
    • L/L Research Store
User Links
  • Login Register
    Login
    Username:
    Password:

    Menu Home Today At a Glance Members CSC & Team Help
    Also visit... About Us Library Blog L/L Research Store Adept Biorhythms

    As of Friday, August 5th, 2022, the Bring4th forums on this page have been converted to a permanent read-only archive. If you would like to continue your journey with Bring4th, the new forums are now at https://discourse.bring4th.org.

    You are invited to enjoy many years worth of forum messages brought forth by our community of seekers. The site search feature remains available to discover topics of interest. (July 22, 2022) x

    Bring4th Bring4th Studies Strictly Law of One Material 1981.02.03 - Book 1, Session 17 - Oahspe

    Thread: 1981.02.03 - Book 1, Session 17 - Oahspe


    Monica (Offline)

    Account Closed
    Posts: 7,043
    Threads: 151
    Joined: Dec 2008
    #57
    09-08-2009, 06:00 PM
    (09-08-2009, 02:47 PM)Quantum Wrote: All is light. All is Love. We are light. We are love. It is stated by the Ra message that by the 51% principle for graduation that we need be minimally at 51% LOVE/LIGHT (L/L) in order to ascend, i.e. Graduate. By this principle we might infer that we need be at 51% L/L from 2D to meet 3D, or from 3D to meet/balance/accept/receive the next higher order of light at 4D Who knows. But what may be stated with certainty nevertheless, as has been instructed, is that this density of 3D requires 51% to move to 4D.

    I don't think that can be inferred. As you state later in this post, Who knows? Ra did not specify. What we do know is that the criteria for graduating from 2D to 3D is sentience, ie. awareness of self as an individual. In 2D there is no polarity; thus, the percentages might have zero meaning/applicability in that density.

    Likewise, even though there is polarity in 4D, it is the density of Love, with graduation being a movement from the density of Love to the density of Wisdom. In contrast to 3D, which is Choice, those higher densities might not utilize polarity in the same was as is done in 3D. Hence, again, the percentages might not be applicable.

    Again, Who knows? Although an interesting topic of speculation, I don't think we can presume to infer any such applicability across the densities. Just as the rules of gravity are different under water as on land, the criteria for graduation might be vastly different in the different densities. I don't recall Ra ever addressing percentages in other densities, specifically. If someone can find such a reference, please do let us know!

    (09-08-2009, 02:47 PM)Quantum Wrote: If 51% is required for us to penetrate/transcend, then may it not stand to reason that our ability to absorb at 51% is the Hallmark for transcendence? We then come to the question of what it is that comprises this/these qualities that allows for the absorption for this movement for transcendence being nominally at 51%. The ability to Love is certainly enough. However, the ability to absorb is perhaps facilitated by the ability to abstract as given by Ra. In other words, the ability to contemplate, deeper, shall we say.

    I would hope not, for that would mean that those with lesser intelligence would be at a disadvantage. I know plenty of people with acute intellects but no love, and others with warm, open hearts but only a weak intellect. And still others who cannot abstract, but can grasp concepts such as love/kindness/generosity and, more importantly, apply those concepts. My understanding of the Law of One is that the application is far more important than the comprehension.

    (09-08-2009, 02:47 PM)Quantum Wrote: It may be a principle of law to any given energy whether it be applied to a living room plant, an animal, a teaching, a law, or graduation.

    Interesting idea. It doesn't resonate with me, because of the Choice being an issue of polarity, and the percentage being an issue of polarity, and the fact that other densities are not necessarily concerned with polarity as criteria. But, who knows? Huh

    The rest of your post offers some interesting speculation. I don't really have comments on that.

      •
    « Next Oldest | Next Newest »

    Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)



    Messages In This Thread
    1981.02.03 - Book 1, Session 17 - Oahspe - by Lavazza - 08-20-2009, 11:52 AM
    RE: 1981.02.03 - Book 1, Session 17 - Oahspe - by βαθμιαίος - 08-20-2009, 12:23 PM
    RE: 1981.02.03 - Book 1, Session 17 - Oahspe - by Whitefeather - 08-20-2009, 04:10 PM
    RE: 1981.02.03 - Book 1, Session 17 - Oahspe - by Lavazza - 08-20-2009, 04:42 PM
    Thoughts on distortions - by 3D Sunset - 09-01-2009, 11:04 AM
    RE: Thoughts on distortions - by Quantum - 09-01-2009, 12:00 PM
    RE: Thoughts on distortions - by Lavazza - 09-02-2009, 11:30 AM
    RE: Revelation - by 3D Sunset - 09-02-2009, 03:09 PM
    RE: Revelation - by Monica - 09-02-2009, 04:56 PM
    RE: Revelation - by Whitefeather - 09-02-2009, 05:31 PM
    RE: Revelation - by Quantum - 09-02-2009, 06:22 PM
    RE: Revelation - by Lavazza - 09-02-2009, 07:16 PM
    RE: Revelation - by Monica - 09-02-2009, 07:36 PM
    RE: Revelation - by 3D Sunset - 09-03-2009, 10:03 AM
    RE: Revelation - by Quantum - 09-03-2009, 11:20 AM
    RE: Revelation - by 3D Sunset - 09-03-2009, 11:40 AM
    RE: Revelation - by Lavazza - 09-03-2009, 11:51 AM
    RE: Revelation - by Quantum - 09-03-2009, 03:12 PM
    RE: Revelation - by 3D Sunset - 09-03-2009, 04:49 PM
    RE: Revelation - by Lavazza - 09-04-2009, 01:52 PM
    RE: Revelation - by Monica - 09-04-2009, 02:03 PM
    RE: Revelation - by Lavazza - 09-02-2009, 05:47 PM
    RE: Thoughts on distortions - by Monica - 09-02-2009, 12:19 PM
    RE: Thoughts on distortions - by Quantum - 09-02-2009, 12:51 PM
    RE: Thoughts on distortions - by Monica - 09-02-2009, 01:40 PM
    RE: 1981.02.03 - Book 1, Session 17 - Oahspe - by Whitefeather - 09-02-2009, 02:29 PM
    RE: 1981.02.03 - Book 1, Session 17 - Oahspe - by Lavazza - 09-02-2009, 07:56 PM
    RE: 1981.02.03 - Book 1, Session 17 - Oahspe - by Monica - 09-02-2009, 08:00 PM
    RE: 1981.02.03 - Book 1, Session 17 - Oahspe - by airwaves - 09-04-2009, 02:20 PM
    RE: 1981.02.03 - Book 1, Session 17 - Oahspe - by Quantum - 09-04-2009, 03:57 PM
    RE: 1981.02.03 - Book 1, Session 17 - Oahspe - by Lavazza - 09-04-2009, 05:08 PM
    RE: 1981.02.03 - Book 1, Session 17 - Oahspe - by Quantum - 09-04-2009, 07:36 PM
    RE: 1981.02.03 - Book 1, Session 17 - Oahspe - by airwaves - 09-05-2009, 12:59 PM
    RE: 1981.02.03 - Book 1, Session 17 - Oahspe - by Monica - 09-05-2009, 02:05 PM
    RE: 1981.02.03 - Book 1, Session 17 - Oahspe - by Quantum - 09-08-2009, 02:47 PM
    RE: 1981.02.03 - Book 1, Session 17 - Oahspe - by Monica - 09-08-2009, 06:00 PM
    RE: 1981.02.03 - Book 1, Session 17 - Oahspe - by Quantum - 09-08-2009, 07:26 PM
    RE: 1981.02.03 - Book 1, Session 17 - Oahspe - by Monica - 09-08-2009, 07:55 PM
    RE: 1981.02.03 - Book 1, Session 17 - Oahspe - by Whitefeather - 09-08-2009, 08:32 PM
    RE: 1981.02.03 - Book 1, Session 17 - Oahspe - by Quantum - 09-08-2009, 09:50 PM
    RE: 1981.02.03 - Book 1, Session 17 - Oahspe - by Monica - 09-19-2009, 04:48 PM
    RE: 1981.02.03 - Book 1, Session 17 - Oahspe - by Lavazza - 09-21-2009, 07:38 PM
    RE: 1981.02.03 - Book 1, Session 17 - Oahspe - by Lavazza - 02-02-2010, 12:24 PM
    RE: 1981.02.03 - Book 1, Session 17 - Oahspe - by Meerie - 07-15-2012, 02:32 PM
    RE: 1981.02.03 - Book 1, Session 17 - Oahspe - by Plenum - 07-15-2012, 02:38 PM
    RE: 1981.02.03 - Book 1, Session 17 - Oahspe - by Patrick - 07-15-2012, 05:28 PM
    RE: 1981.02.03 - Book 1, Session 17 - Oahspe - by AnthroHeart - 07-15-2012, 08:52 PM
    RE: 1981.02.03 - Book 1, Session 17 - Oahspe - by Patrick - 07-16-2012, 08:42 AM
    RE: 1981.02.03 - Book 1, Session 17 - Oahspe - by βαθμιαίος - 07-15-2012, 08:47 PM
    RE: 1981.02.03 - Book 1, Session 17 - Oahspe - by kdsii - 07-15-2012, 08:59 PM
    RE: 1981.02.03 - Book 1, Session 17 - Oahspe - by Meerie - 07-16-2012, 02:04 AM
    RE: 1981.02.03 - Book 1, Session 17 - Oahspe - by βαθμιαίος - 07-16-2012, 07:46 AM
    RE: 1981.02.03 - Book 1, Session 17 - Oahspe - by Meerie - 07-15-2012, 02:41 PM
    RE: 1981.02.03 - Book 1, Session 17 - Oahspe - by Etude in B Minor - 07-22-2012, 10:49 PM
    RE: 1981.02.03 - Book 1, Session 17 - Oahspe - by Etude in B Minor - 08-01-2012, 07:15 PM
    RE: 1981.02.03 - Book 1, Session 17 - Oahspe - by AnthroHeart - 08-01-2012, 07:29 PM
    RE: 1981.02.03 - Book 1, Session 17 - Oahspe - by Parsons - 02-10-2016, 11:17 PM
    RE: 1981.02.03 - Book 1, Session 17 - Oahspe - by J.W. - 07-16-2022, 01:47 AM

    • View a Printable Version
    • Subscribe to this thread

    © Template Design by D&D - Powered by MyBB

    Connect with L/L Research on Social Media

    Linear Mode
    Threaded Mode