Bring4th Forums
  • Login Register
    Login
    Username:
    Password:
  • Archive Home
  • Members
  • Team
  • Help
  • More
    • About Us
    • Library
    • L/L Research Store
User Links
  • Login Register
    Login
    Username:
    Password:

    Menu Home Today At a Glance Members CSC & Team Help
    Also visit... About Us Library Blog L/L Research Store Adept Biorhythms

    As of Friday, August 5th, 2022, the Bring4th forums on this page have been converted to a permanent read-only archive. If you would like to continue your journey with Bring4th, the new forums are now at https://discourse.bring4th.org.

    You are invited to enjoy many years worth of forum messages brought forth by our community of seekers. The site search feature remains available to discover topics of interest. (July 22, 2022) x

    Bring4th Bring4th Studies Strictly Law of One Material 1981.02.03 - Book 1, Session 17 - Oahspe

    Thread: 1981.02.03 - Book 1, Session 17 - Oahspe


    Monica (Offline)

    Account Closed
    Posts: 7,043
    Threads: 151
    Joined: Dec 2008
    #59
    09-08-2009, 07:55 PM (This post was last modified: 09-08-2009, 08:43 PM by Monica.)
    (09-08-2009, 07:26 PM)Quantum Wrote: Again, I said this? Look above wherein I state LOVE is enough. I am suggesting that love coupled also with the principle of contemplation allows polarization more acutely, this as specified in a Ra quote as seen and discussed in the "Rapid Polarization vis-a-vis Abstraction" thread on "Life on Planet Earth." Love is plenty enough. There may however be "far more to work with" as Ra stated, coupled with love.

    Yes, you did indeed say love is enough. But then proceed to offer that maybe something could be added to it, by the terms love coupled also with. (If I'm misunderstanding you, please let me know!)
    At the risk of splitting hairs, I think the difference between what I understand you to be saying and what I'm saying is this: I don't think anything can be added to love, for love is all there is. I don't think anything can be added to the final value of how much love/light is being absorbed/radiated, as demonstrated by the walking of the Steps of Light. I would agree that intellectual understanding is of value, certainly, but only in its assistance to radiate more love. I don't think it adds anything to the equation on its own, at least not for purposes of graduation to 4D. Some of us might be working on the lessons of other densities, simultaneously with our 3D lessons, like wisdom and communication. So, for those purposes, surely intellectual understanding has value. And surely intellectual understanding has value, even for 3D lessons. I just don't think it has value in the sense of being extra credit points for graduation, so to speak.
    (09-08-2009, 07:26 PM)Quantum Wrote: Suggesting we don't know as an already established understanding serves only to stifle the imagination of to what else the principles the LOO Material may also apply other than to singularly that which has been given.

    OK...Well, I was just quoting you, when you said Who knows? Wink

    (09-08-2009, 02:47 PM)Quantum Wrote: It may well be that all densities require only 51%, or it may be that the next density requires more than 51%, say at 55% for example to penetrate from 4D to 5D, and the next from 5D to 6D at 60% for example, or any derivation larger or even smaller than 51%, and so on ad infinitum. Who knows.

    I thought it sounded good so I used it too! Tongue

    (09-08-2009, 07:26 PM)Quantum Wrote: Infer nonetheless, just for the exercise and wonderment, if not simply for the sheer joy of the "unknown maybe". Who knows needn't be offered with each new "maybe". We know we don't know.

    I understand your point and don't want to diminish in any way your sense of wonderment. Personally, I find that I get so much exercise already, just dealing with everyday catalyst, that I keep plenty busy. I feel like I'm on a rollercoaster, climbing to the top, about to have the ride of my life. We're so close to 2012, and even if nothing happens in terms of anything dramatic, I still feel such a sense of urgency about mundane tasks like dealing with catalyst and seeking guidance on how I might do my little teeny part to help our cosmic friends increase the Harvest. I guess I feel so busy with 3D-4D that matters of graduation to the other densities aren't as relevant to me. That's not to say they aren't interesting! Nor do I intend to sound flippant, so I apologize if I did. I just feel that there is already so much richness to be explored just in learning how to apply the Law of One to our everyday lives. That's what intrigues me the most. But I honor and respect your interest in exploring these concepts. I'm just explaining why I might not see it in quite the same light.

      •
    « Next Oldest | Next Newest »

    Users browsing this thread: 2 Guest(s)



    Messages In This Thread
    1981.02.03 - Book 1, Session 17 - Oahspe - by Lavazza - 08-20-2009, 11:52 AM
    RE: 1981.02.03 - Book 1, Session 17 - Oahspe - by βαθμιαίος - 08-20-2009, 12:23 PM
    RE: 1981.02.03 - Book 1, Session 17 - Oahspe - by Whitefeather - 08-20-2009, 04:10 PM
    RE: 1981.02.03 - Book 1, Session 17 - Oahspe - by Lavazza - 08-20-2009, 04:42 PM
    Thoughts on distortions - by 3D Sunset - 09-01-2009, 11:04 AM
    RE: Thoughts on distortions - by Quantum - 09-01-2009, 12:00 PM
    RE: Thoughts on distortions - by Lavazza - 09-02-2009, 11:30 AM
    RE: Revelation - by 3D Sunset - 09-02-2009, 03:09 PM
    RE: Revelation - by Monica - 09-02-2009, 04:56 PM
    RE: Revelation - by Whitefeather - 09-02-2009, 05:31 PM
    RE: Revelation - by Quantum - 09-02-2009, 06:22 PM
    RE: Revelation - by Lavazza - 09-02-2009, 07:16 PM
    RE: Revelation - by Monica - 09-02-2009, 07:36 PM
    RE: Revelation - by 3D Sunset - 09-03-2009, 10:03 AM
    RE: Revelation - by Quantum - 09-03-2009, 11:20 AM
    RE: Revelation - by 3D Sunset - 09-03-2009, 11:40 AM
    RE: Revelation - by Lavazza - 09-03-2009, 11:51 AM
    RE: Revelation - by Quantum - 09-03-2009, 03:12 PM
    RE: Revelation - by 3D Sunset - 09-03-2009, 04:49 PM
    RE: Revelation - by Lavazza - 09-04-2009, 01:52 PM
    RE: Revelation - by Monica - 09-04-2009, 02:03 PM
    RE: Revelation - by Lavazza - 09-02-2009, 05:47 PM
    RE: Thoughts on distortions - by Monica - 09-02-2009, 12:19 PM
    RE: Thoughts on distortions - by Quantum - 09-02-2009, 12:51 PM
    RE: Thoughts on distortions - by Monica - 09-02-2009, 01:40 PM
    RE: 1981.02.03 - Book 1, Session 17 - Oahspe - by Whitefeather - 09-02-2009, 02:29 PM
    RE: 1981.02.03 - Book 1, Session 17 - Oahspe - by Lavazza - 09-02-2009, 07:56 PM
    RE: 1981.02.03 - Book 1, Session 17 - Oahspe - by Monica - 09-02-2009, 08:00 PM
    RE: 1981.02.03 - Book 1, Session 17 - Oahspe - by airwaves - 09-04-2009, 02:20 PM
    RE: 1981.02.03 - Book 1, Session 17 - Oahspe - by Quantum - 09-04-2009, 03:57 PM
    RE: 1981.02.03 - Book 1, Session 17 - Oahspe - by Lavazza - 09-04-2009, 05:08 PM
    RE: 1981.02.03 - Book 1, Session 17 - Oahspe - by Quantum - 09-04-2009, 07:36 PM
    RE: 1981.02.03 - Book 1, Session 17 - Oahspe - by airwaves - 09-05-2009, 12:59 PM
    RE: 1981.02.03 - Book 1, Session 17 - Oahspe - by Monica - 09-05-2009, 02:05 PM
    RE: 1981.02.03 - Book 1, Session 17 - Oahspe - by Quantum - 09-08-2009, 02:47 PM
    RE: 1981.02.03 - Book 1, Session 17 - Oahspe - by Monica - 09-08-2009, 06:00 PM
    RE: 1981.02.03 - Book 1, Session 17 - Oahspe - by Quantum - 09-08-2009, 07:26 PM
    RE: 1981.02.03 - Book 1, Session 17 - Oahspe - by Monica - 09-08-2009, 07:55 PM
    RE: 1981.02.03 - Book 1, Session 17 - Oahspe - by Whitefeather - 09-08-2009, 08:32 PM
    RE: 1981.02.03 - Book 1, Session 17 - Oahspe - by Quantum - 09-08-2009, 09:50 PM
    RE: 1981.02.03 - Book 1, Session 17 - Oahspe - by Monica - 09-19-2009, 04:48 PM
    RE: 1981.02.03 - Book 1, Session 17 - Oahspe - by Lavazza - 09-21-2009, 07:38 PM
    RE: 1981.02.03 - Book 1, Session 17 - Oahspe - by Lavazza - 02-02-2010, 12:24 PM
    RE: 1981.02.03 - Book 1, Session 17 - Oahspe - by Meerie - 07-15-2012, 02:32 PM
    RE: 1981.02.03 - Book 1, Session 17 - Oahspe - by Plenum - 07-15-2012, 02:38 PM
    RE: 1981.02.03 - Book 1, Session 17 - Oahspe - by Patrick - 07-15-2012, 05:28 PM
    RE: 1981.02.03 - Book 1, Session 17 - Oahspe - by AnthroHeart - 07-15-2012, 08:52 PM
    RE: 1981.02.03 - Book 1, Session 17 - Oahspe - by Patrick - 07-16-2012, 08:42 AM
    RE: 1981.02.03 - Book 1, Session 17 - Oahspe - by βαθμιαίος - 07-15-2012, 08:47 PM
    RE: 1981.02.03 - Book 1, Session 17 - Oahspe - by kdsii - 07-15-2012, 08:59 PM
    RE: 1981.02.03 - Book 1, Session 17 - Oahspe - by Meerie - 07-16-2012, 02:04 AM
    RE: 1981.02.03 - Book 1, Session 17 - Oahspe - by βαθμιαίος - 07-16-2012, 07:46 AM
    RE: 1981.02.03 - Book 1, Session 17 - Oahspe - by Meerie - 07-15-2012, 02:41 PM
    RE: 1981.02.03 - Book 1, Session 17 - Oahspe - by Etude in B Minor - 07-22-2012, 10:49 PM
    RE: 1981.02.03 - Book 1, Session 17 - Oahspe - by Etude in B Minor - 08-01-2012, 07:15 PM
    RE: 1981.02.03 - Book 1, Session 17 - Oahspe - by AnthroHeart - 08-01-2012, 07:29 PM
    RE: 1981.02.03 - Book 1, Session 17 - Oahspe - by Parsons - 02-10-2016, 11:17 PM
    RE: 1981.02.03 - Book 1, Session 17 - Oahspe - by J.W. - 07-16-2022, 01:47 AM

    • View a Printable Version
    • Subscribe to this thread

    © Template Design by D&D - Powered by MyBB

    Connect with L/L Research on Social Media

    Linear Mode
    Threaded Mode