Bring4th Forums
  • Login Register
    Login
    Username:
    Password:
  • Archive Home
  • Members
  • Team
  • Help
  • More
    • About Us
    • Library
    • L/L Research Store
User Links
  • Login Register
    Login
    Username:
    Password:

    Menu Home Today At a Glance Members CSC & Team Help
    Also visit... About Us Library Blog L/L Research Store Adept Biorhythms

    As of Friday, August 5th, 2022, the Bring4th forums on this page have been converted to a permanent read-only archive. If you would like to continue your journey with Bring4th, the new forums are now at https://discourse.bring4th.org.

    You are invited to enjoy many years worth of forum messages brought forth by our community of seekers. The site search feature remains available to discover topics of interest. (July 22, 2022) x

    Bring4th Bring4th Studies Strictly Law of One Material 1981.02.03 - Book 1, Session 17 - Oahspe

    Thread: 1981.02.03 - Book 1, Session 17 - Oahspe


    Quantum (Offline)

    Member
    Posts: 249
    Threads: 12
    Joined: Jan 2009
    #61
    09-08-2009, 09:50 PM (This post was last modified: 09-08-2009, 09:52 PM by Quantum.)
    (09-08-2009, 07:26 PM)Quantum Wrote: ..Look above wherein I state LOVE is enough. I am suggesting that love coupled also with the principle of contemplation allows polarization more acutely, this as specified in a Ra quote as seen and discussed in the "Rapid Polarization vis-a-vis Abstraction" thread on "Life on Planet Earth." Love is plenty enough. There may however be "far more to work with" as Ra stated, coupled with love.
    (09-08-2009, 07:55 PM)Bring4th_Monica Wrote: Yes, you did indeed say love is enough. But then proceed to offer that maybe something could be added to it, by the terms love coupled also with. (If I'm misunderstanding you, please let me know!)
    At the risk of splitting hairs, I think the difference between what I understand you to be saying and what I'm saying is this: I don't think anything can be added to love, for love is all there is. I don't think anything can be added to the final value of how much love/light is being absorbed/radiated,
    I am speaking to the direct quote by Ra that those with the ability to abstract have a bit more to work with as regards polarizing more rapidly. Yes Love is enough, but it helps a bit to offer contemplation to it to polarize more rapidly. This is fully addressed for those interested in the "Rapid Polarization vis-s-vis Abstraction" thread on "Life On Planet Earth" as previously noted.
    (09-08-2009, 07:26 PM)Quantum Wrote: .....just for the exercise and wonderment, if not simply for the sheer joy of the "unknown maybe". Who knows needn't be offered with each new "maybe". We know we don't know.
    (09-08-2009, 07:55 PM)Bring4th_Monica Wrote: I understand your point and don't want to diminish in any way your sense of wonderment. Personally, I find that I get so much exercise already, just dealing with everyday catalyst, that I keep plenty busy.
    Each according to their own paths.. All is well.

    From Whitefeather:
    (09-08-2009, 02:47 PM)Quantum Wrote: ...it seems that in order for Love/Light to cause to move/ascend transcendentally, it must be received at least at 51% in kind in order for the said recipient thereof to act on same. His filters may be on at 49%, but off enough at 51% enough so as to receive at 51%. Thus the said reception of the L/L principle is minimally required at 51% to indeed cause to move equally at the 51% mark and thus transcend minimally at 51%. ...as it has been instructed, is that this density of 3D requires 51% to move to 4D. ....If 51% is required for us to penetrate/transcend, then may it not stand to reason that our ability to absorb at 51% is the Hallmark for transcendence?

    (09-08-2009, 08:32 PM)Whitefeather Wrote: Greetings Quantum and thank you for your views, quite intellectual approach indeed! cool. I got only a few excerpts out. Since you mention the 51% and graduation topics, I thought of sharing this below with you.

    I understand differently the 51% STO path. For me the 51% are rather on the giving end than on the receiving end....It is real simple the way I 'see' this: It comes to 51% giving versus 49% taking, basically!
    Greetings as well Whitefeather. I appreciate your musings and willingness to engage. My question to your wonderful approach would be this, this in the Ra vernacular: What is giving if not taking, i.e offerer/acceptor vs acceptor/offerer(?) What lesson-teaching may I indeed offer other than what I have accepted so that I may give? They emanate from the same energy and principle. See? There is no separation in either energy in its time/space format other than that which we individualize in our space/time format.
    (09-08-2009, 08:32 PM)Whitefeather Wrote: I am sure that somewhere Ra mentions the kind of energy we transfer through each of our chakra.
    Indeed they did, and quite extensively I might add. I would invite you to read on the material extensively, as you are absolutely intuiting correctly in many respects.
    (09-08-2009, 08:32 PM)Whitefeather Wrote: I would not say that these 51% are matching our level of consciousness in the sense that it is virtually impossible to be more that 52% STO while surviving in 3D as human beings, since our metabolism itself is mainly an STS activity and so is our immune system.
    This might be challenged quite rigorously, at least certainly from the Ra Material vs what other source you may be drawing from. One may presumably be vibrating quite higher than a mere 52%, although there is nothing specific to this as quotable fact by Ra, were any member to request I provide such evidence. I speculate, deduce, induce, and wonder only, lest any feel I presume. However Ra states specifically the fact that one need"only" be at 51% to graduate. The mere fact that Ra however suggested that one "only" need be at 51% however, suggests by deduction that more than 51% is also evident, thus more than 52% by inference as well .

    I am also quite intrigued if not marveled on your view that the human immune system and metabolism has a polarity of STS in any manner whatsoever. Let us take flight with speculation once more as an exercise. Let us assume that a highly STO individual is ready for graduation at say a 60%-75% STO level, notwithstanding that you believe no one may achieve more than 52%. Would a highly STO oriented individual not also be in high synchronization to all systems within his body, and not also have a highly oriented immune system as well, functioning in fluidity, even paradoxically in the midst of a cancer that is ravaging him? Allow your mind to bend at the seeming contradiction. But to your point in any event, I would suggest that the immune system serves in the light to ward off dis-ease, this as much serving STO as it does STS , verses being primarily or wholly STS.

    Curious to your further ponderings.......and speculations...

    Q

      •
    « Next Oldest | Next Newest »

    Users browsing this thread:



    Messages In This Thread
    1981.02.03 - Book 1, Session 17 - Oahspe - by Lavazza - 08-20-2009, 11:52 AM
    RE: 1981.02.03 - Book 1, Session 17 - Oahspe - by βαθμιαίος - 08-20-2009, 12:23 PM
    RE: 1981.02.03 - Book 1, Session 17 - Oahspe - by Whitefeather - 08-20-2009, 04:10 PM
    RE: 1981.02.03 - Book 1, Session 17 - Oahspe - by Lavazza - 08-20-2009, 04:42 PM
    Thoughts on distortions - by 3D Sunset - 09-01-2009, 11:04 AM
    RE: Thoughts on distortions - by Quantum - 09-01-2009, 12:00 PM
    RE: Thoughts on distortions - by Lavazza - 09-02-2009, 11:30 AM
    RE: Revelation - by 3D Sunset - 09-02-2009, 03:09 PM
    RE: Revelation - by Monica - 09-02-2009, 04:56 PM
    RE: Revelation - by Whitefeather - 09-02-2009, 05:31 PM
    RE: Revelation - by Quantum - 09-02-2009, 06:22 PM
    RE: Revelation - by Lavazza - 09-02-2009, 07:16 PM
    RE: Revelation - by Monica - 09-02-2009, 07:36 PM
    RE: Revelation - by 3D Sunset - 09-03-2009, 10:03 AM
    RE: Revelation - by Quantum - 09-03-2009, 11:20 AM
    RE: Revelation - by 3D Sunset - 09-03-2009, 11:40 AM
    RE: Revelation - by Lavazza - 09-03-2009, 11:51 AM
    RE: Revelation - by Quantum - 09-03-2009, 03:12 PM
    RE: Revelation - by 3D Sunset - 09-03-2009, 04:49 PM
    RE: Revelation - by Lavazza - 09-04-2009, 01:52 PM
    RE: Revelation - by Monica - 09-04-2009, 02:03 PM
    RE: Revelation - by Lavazza - 09-02-2009, 05:47 PM
    RE: Thoughts on distortions - by Monica - 09-02-2009, 12:19 PM
    RE: Thoughts on distortions - by Quantum - 09-02-2009, 12:51 PM
    RE: Thoughts on distortions - by Monica - 09-02-2009, 01:40 PM
    RE: 1981.02.03 - Book 1, Session 17 - Oahspe - by Whitefeather - 09-02-2009, 02:29 PM
    RE: 1981.02.03 - Book 1, Session 17 - Oahspe - by Lavazza - 09-02-2009, 07:56 PM
    RE: 1981.02.03 - Book 1, Session 17 - Oahspe - by Monica - 09-02-2009, 08:00 PM
    RE: 1981.02.03 - Book 1, Session 17 - Oahspe - by airwaves - 09-04-2009, 02:20 PM
    RE: 1981.02.03 - Book 1, Session 17 - Oahspe - by Quantum - 09-04-2009, 03:57 PM
    RE: 1981.02.03 - Book 1, Session 17 - Oahspe - by Lavazza - 09-04-2009, 05:08 PM
    RE: 1981.02.03 - Book 1, Session 17 - Oahspe - by Quantum - 09-04-2009, 07:36 PM
    RE: 1981.02.03 - Book 1, Session 17 - Oahspe - by airwaves - 09-05-2009, 12:59 PM
    RE: 1981.02.03 - Book 1, Session 17 - Oahspe - by Monica - 09-05-2009, 02:05 PM
    RE: 1981.02.03 - Book 1, Session 17 - Oahspe - by Quantum - 09-08-2009, 02:47 PM
    RE: 1981.02.03 - Book 1, Session 17 - Oahspe - by Monica - 09-08-2009, 06:00 PM
    RE: 1981.02.03 - Book 1, Session 17 - Oahspe - by Quantum - 09-08-2009, 07:26 PM
    RE: 1981.02.03 - Book 1, Session 17 - Oahspe - by Monica - 09-08-2009, 07:55 PM
    RE: 1981.02.03 - Book 1, Session 17 - Oahspe - by Whitefeather - 09-08-2009, 08:32 PM
    RE: 1981.02.03 - Book 1, Session 17 - Oahspe - by Quantum - 09-08-2009, 09:50 PM
    RE: 1981.02.03 - Book 1, Session 17 - Oahspe - by Monica - 09-19-2009, 04:48 PM
    RE: 1981.02.03 - Book 1, Session 17 - Oahspe - by Lavazza - 09-21-2009, 07:38 PM
    RE: 1981.02.03 - Book 1, Session 17 - Oahspe - by Lavazza - 02-02-2010, 12:24 PM
    RE: 1981.02.03 - Book 1, Session 17 - Oahspe - by Meerie - 07-15-2012, 02:32 PM
    RE: 1981.02.03 - Book 1, Session 17 - Oahspe - by Plenum - 07-15-2012, 02:38 PM
    RE: 1981.02.03 - Book 1, Session 17 - Oahspe - by Patrick - 07-15-2012, 05:28 PM
    RE: 1981.02.03 - Book 1, Session 17 - Oahspe - by AnthroHeart - 07-15-2012, 08:52 PM
    RE: 1981.02.03 - Book 1, Session 17 - Oahspe - by Patrick - 07-16-2012, 08:42 AM
    RE: 1981.02.03 - Book 1, Session 17 - Oahspe - by βαθμιαίος - 07-15-2012, 08:47 PM
    RE: 1981.02.03 - Book 1, Session 17 - Oahspe - by kdsii - 07-15-2012, 08:59 PM
    RE: 1981.02.03 - Book 1, Session 17 - Oahspe - by Meerie - 07-16-2012, 02:04 AM
    RE: 1981.02.03 - Book 1, Session 17 - Oahspe - by βαθμιαίος - 07-16-2012, 07:46 AM
    RE: 1981.02.03 - Book 1, Session 17 - Oahspe - by Meerie - 07-15-2012, 02:41 PM
    RE: 1981.02.03 - Book 1, Session 17 - Oahspe - by Etude in B Minor - 07-22-2012, 10:49 PM
    RE: 1981.02.03 - Book 1, Session 17 - Oahspe - by Etude in B Minor - 08-01-2012, 07:15 PM
    RE: 1981.02.03 - Book 1, Session 17 - Oahspe - by AnthroHeart - 08-01-2012, 07:29 PM
    RE: 1981.02.03 - Book 1, Session 17 - Oahspe - by Parsons - 02-10-2016, 11:17 PM
    RE: 1981.02.03 - Book 1, Session 17 - Oahspe - by J.W. - 07-16-2022, 01:47 AM

    • View a Printable Version
    • Subscribe to this thread

    © Template Design by D&D - Powered by MyBB

    Connect with L/L Research on Social Media

    Linear Mode
    Threaded Mode