The Google UFO logo.

[Lavazza]

Lavazza, it was my pleasure to share what I know. (You know me :-P ) I don't follow blossoms channeling. I read it around august last year for some reason but I couldn't find much more than a few feel good vibes. She's a nice person. I had the impression of her being in it for the money, but after checking all the facts I had to take that back. I think she believed it as well. I believe she's a good person. So I mostly feel compassion for her. I'm not so sure about her sources. To do this to her is pretty nasty. The claim that they could not predict the human response in advance seems to me rather naive because I certainly could.

I agree, it is a terribly nasty thing that she went through. I wonder to what degree that event was pre-incarnation programming?

As for your spreadsheet, I'm formally trained in statistics and methodology, if there's anything you want to do with the information I'll be more than willing to lend a hand. However I'm a little worried that since all the predictions are different in probability we can't really do more than describe the figures. (Some predictions are more likely than others) But the exact date matches seem impossible enough to just speak for themselves. Also I've seen comparisons like this before, and over 50% accuracy is impressive even among good psychics. I mean it's a shame he's not on the web Maybe you should drag him here by his ears Maybe not. But it's a nice thought

You do have a point, 50% for reading the future ain't bad at all. Some of the predictions have been very accurate too. And of course some have been way off. Just enough right and wrong perhaps to prevent anyone from using the material as a guide (could be intentional?)

If you have the time and interest, you are more than welcome to attempt to shuffle the information around in a more sensible configuration, especially if you think it could be evaluated better or more accurately.

I was thinking earlier that it would be worthwhile to compile ALL predictions that are channeled on the internet in to a huge database to see what is predicted the most, and then see if those are more likely to come true. But of course that is also a huge undertaking, probably requiring the time of someone 40+ hours a week. I'd attempt it but I would also be laid off from my real job!