The Google UFO logo.

[Ali Quadir]

I agree, it is a terribly nasty thing that she went through. I wonder to what degree that event was pre-incarnation programming?

Maybe these things just happen. Nothing is without a reason in the end. But to what extend can we really divine the reason?

You do have a point, 50% for reading the future ain't bad at all. Some of the predictions have been very accurate too.

33 accurate dates is insane. If you look at it as if it were weather prediction then we can usually say with some accuracy that some rain is coming but we can't predict the time very accurately. Because so many variables push the event forward or backwards. The fact that he gets the dates right means he sees clearly. The fact that it only comes true 50% of the time means that he sees clearly in the wrong timeline half the time.

And of course some have been way off. Just enough right and wrong perhaps to prevent anyone from using the material as a guide (could be intentional?)

In my opinion this is an artefact of the timelines not being fixed. We live in space time and probability, most psychics can only look forward in time and they see what would happen if we move forward on this timeline. But stepping from one timeline to another occurs in a relevant manner (If we look at the numbers here) about 50% of the time.

Anyway, that's just my interpretation.

If you have the time and interest, you are more than welcome to attempt to shuffle the information around in a more sensible configuration, especially if you think it could be evaluated better or more accurately.

You put it down nicely. But I don't see any specific thing to let the statistics loose on. You can only describe and you pretty much did that. Statistics used to test something is usually comparing against something. There's nothing to compare to here.

I was thinking earlier that it would be worthwhile to compile ALL predictions that are channeled on the internet in to a huge database to see what is predicted the most, and then see if those are more likely to come true. But of course that is also a huge undertaking, probably requiring the time of someone 40+ hours a week. I'd attempt it but I would also be laid off from my real job!

Heh You might be interested in webbot though, it's not exactly a compilation of all predictions in a central database. But it's a compilation of all subjects publicly available on the internet. Basically what they do is crawl websites to see if some topics change frequency. If this happens without outside cause then it's often a predictor for something about to happen that people consciously or subconsciously see coming.