10-08-2011, 07:13 PM
(10-08-2011, 03:39 PM)abridgetoofar Wrote:(10-06-2011, 08:32 AM)unity100 Wrote: loving something does not mean ignoring its nature.
in this current 3d to 6d continuum there is good and evil, there is right and wrong, there is 'should do', and 'should not do'.
love doesnt mean ignoring of base rules and mechanics infinite intelligence put forth in these densities in order to facilitate progress.
Not "ignoring something's nature" doesn't mean labeling it as right, wrong, good, evil, etc.
it does. you assign desirability depending on the nature of concepts in line with your desired path. it doesnt matter whether you call something congruent with your path 'good', or call it 'efficient'. it is still differentiation based on preference according to paths.
Quote:What's right for you may not right for an STS individual, and may not right for an individual content with indifference, and none of those entities are better or more worthy to the Creator than the other (unless, of course, by your own opinion). What you consider "good," someone else may consider "evil," and since these are not mechanical descriptions (completely subjective), no one can expect to share the same definitions as another.
Mechanically, yes, there is positive (integrating, accepting) and negative (segregating, separating), and those can be examined objectively, but saying either of those "should or shouldn't" be done, are "good or evil," or are "right or wrong," is not something that can even be discussed objectively.
you cannot polarize positively by enslaving people. that's negative. so, its 'evil' if you are positive. it doesnt matter whether you call 'negative' as a positive person. it is still undesired in your chosen path. its as simple as that. there is no 'subjectivity' here. it is the way the polarity thing was made, just like how light travels in a straight line, and there is no changing that.
existential mechanics in universe does not revolve on people's preferences or perspectives. they work as they were designed to do. no amount of talking will make light travel in a non straight line without external factors.