10-19-2011, 04:25 PM
(This post was last modified: 10-19-2011, 04:41 PM by JustLikeYou.)
zenmaster Wrote:Yes, but do the means justify the ends?I'm not sure what you mean by this since the phrase typically runs the other way.
Nevertheless, I find him very self-consistent, which is my most important truth-filter.
unity100 Wrote:moreover, it is appalling how people rationalize, justify and even exonerate some information that is declared to be out of negative sources, just because they see some juicy stuff in it they like to believe in.
this explains how the religions of middle east had gained following despite being from negative orion influence.
You seem to operate under the assumption, unity, that the negative polarity is a mistake of some kind. There are no mistakes. The negative polarity is a useful means of bringing experience to the Creator. Being of positive polarity does not entail somehow denigrating or being disgusted with those of the negative. Nor does being of the negative polarity entail being disgusted with those of the positive. This is like you and a friend playing WoW: you are Alliance and he is Horde. You aren't going to tell each other everything because you are at odds with each other in the game, but that doesn't mean you don't have good will toward each other.
It is important to keep in mind that negatives have extremely well-balanced red, orange, and yellow rays. In other words, they do not have bad habits because they can't harvest if they do. They are cold and calculating, but have no desire for malice because malice is of imbalance.
All this said, there is no need to justify curiosity and interest in a negative entity, because you can judge the truth for yourself: measure the self-consistence and simplicity of the message with your mind and weigh the thrust of the message against your heart. These have been unwavering guidelines for me.
unity100 Wrote:even as of 1981, the world consciousness was still orange.
Can you show me where Ra says this?