Bring4th Forums
  • Login Register
    Login
    Username:
    Password:
  • Archive Home
  • Members
  • Team
  • Help
  • More
    • About Us
    • Library
    • L/L Research Store
User Links
  • Login Register
    Login
    Username:
    Password:

    Menu Home Today At a Glance Members CSC & Team Help
    Also visit... About Us Library Blog L/L Research Store Adept Biorhythms

    As of Friday, August 5th, 2022, the Bring4th forums on this page have been converted to a permanent read-only archive. If you would like to continue your journey with Bring4th, the new forums are now at https://discourse.bring4th.org.

    You are invited to enjoy many years worth of forum messages brought forth by our community of seekers. The site search feature remains available to discover topics of interest. (July 22, 2022) x

    Bring4th Bring4th Studies Strictly Law of One Material STS, trying to understand

    Thread: STS, trying to understand


    Lavazza (Offline)

    Humble Citizen of Eternity
    Posts: 1,029
    Threads: 109
    Joined: Jan 2009
    #1
    10-15-2009, 12:48 PM (This post was last modified: 10-15-2009, 12:49 PM by Lavazza.)
    Hello everyone,

    This is a topic I have been pondering for some time. I do not fully understand the purpose of the STS path... I do not understand why it exists. There are two things that I have often heard as a way of explaining STS. One is, of course, free will. Entities have the free will to be of STS if they so choose. The other is a mystical belief of mine that all things, that is to say, ALL things in the universe must have a balance of some sort. I will expand on these two ideas and discuss some other aspects of my STS confusion below. (session and question numbers added in parentheses where needed). I will also acknowledge that my own bias is STO and as such I have a somewhat biased view of STS (if I may say... Smile) I am of course writing from my STO perspective and not a balanced perspective and as such my logic may well be flawed or naive when viewed from a larger perspective. Yet I do not find much solace in this possibility, at least at this point in my development. One last notation- when I speak of the STS path, I am mostly speaking to the extreme STS entities that go out of their way to be of STS, so that they might (consciously or not) become more STS polarized and progress in that fashion. Not so much the lesser, shall we say mixed polarity entities that are acting mostly from basic survivalist positions in life. I'm talking about the Himmlers, Kahns, etc.

    So...

    Free will
    So, in a universe governed by free will and with a large enough spread of diversity in the way of sparks of creation from the god source (i.e. entities such as ourselves) we should naturally run in to just about every walk of life imaginable. This makes sense to me. And yet, how is it that as many as 10% of all third density harvestable entities should choose the negative path (65.13) when the second distortion of the Law of One is unconditional love (27.11)? I understand that the first distortion is indeed freewill, second being love which is to say freewill exists first and foremost with love being secondary. Yet it is paradoxical that as many as 10% could interpret the second distortion in (from my view) such a distorted way. I would rather expect 1% if any.

    Balance
    Every action has an opposite and equal reaction...? The Ying needs a Yang? This is what Ra seems to indicate is required before returning to the creator, and what 6th density is all about (16.19, 47.5). But, why is it that a seemingly loving creator (my naivete again?) would seek to know elements of itself that is harmful to itself (STS actions as perceived by the victim)? I think we could make a case that god is loving because we were split off from god in the beginning, we exist, we are. Or is it that the supposed STS entity would see this as an un-loving act, to have to experience separation?

    A dead end path...
    As we have learned from the Ra material, STS entities can only travel so far along their chosen path. (can't find session) In mid-sixth density, the negative entity realizes that it cannot progress any further without realizing that it must love others as it loves itself in order to master the lesson of unity. Is it just my perspective that it seems highly awkward for an entity to progress on a spiritual path for millions of years with a misguided premise before finally realizing the "correct" path?

    Further speculation...
    One might also argue that without STS, STO would be meaningless. But I would challenge that idea.

    I think it would be perfectly reasonable if we imagined a completely different paradigm of our reality. Suppose with me for a minute, that there is NO STS path. God is only about love, and we are all creations of love in physical manifest form. However, we do have a thick veil about us. This veil should be more than sufficient catalyst to create any and all opportunities (seemingly STS actions) for STO action. However the key difference is that everyone who participates in STS actions (murder, theft, hatred, etc) are not working from deep subconscious desires to polarize in STS or "evil" ways, but are simply mis-guided, emotionally traumatized or otherwise suffering entities. After their death they are welcomed back in to the spirit world and undergo much healing, learning what they did wrong and why, and then reincarnating later on with the intent of doing better at those life lessons. This is the paradigm that Michael Newton has observed in his books 'Journy of Souls' and 'Destiny of Souls'.

    In conclusion (for now), I will state that the STS path is one in which I am more than ready to 'leave behind' as Q'uo might suggest I do. If I cannot find resolve on this I will surely do so. In the meanwhile I welcome any and all comments on my perspectives, and hopefully I can find some understanding.

    Love and Light to all,
    Lavazza

      •
    « Next Oldest | Next Newest »

    Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)



    Messages In This Thread
    STS, trying to understand - by Lavazza - 10-15-2009, 12:48 PM
    RE: STS, trying to understand - by Phoenix - 10-15-2009, 01:11 PM
    RE: STS, trying to understand - by fairyfarmgirl - 10-15-2009, 02:00 PM
    RE: STS, trying to understand - by Ali Quadir - 10-15-2009, 04:37 PM
    RE: STS, trying to understand - by fairyfarmgirl - 10-15-2009, 05:26 PM
    RE: STS, trying to understand - by ubergud - 10-15-2009, 05:46 PM
    RE: STS, trying to understand - by 3D Sunset - 10-16-2009, 11:08 AM
    RE: STS, trying to understand - by kylissa - 10-16-2009, 11:33 PM
    RE: STS, trying to understand - by Sacred Fool - 10-17-2009, 02:29 PM
    RE: STS, trying to understand - by Ali Quadir - 10-17-2009, 08:57 PM
    RE: STS, trying to understand - by βαθμιαίος - 10-17-2009, 09:35 PM
    RE: STS, trying to understand - by Sacred Fool - 10-18-2009, 12:29 PM
    RE: STS, trying to understand - by Ali Quadir - 10-18-2009, 03:50 PM
    RE: STS, trying to understand - by Turtle - 10-18-2009, 04:28 PM
    RE: STS, trying to understand - by Lighthead - 05-27-2015, 02:35 AM
    RE: STS, trying to understand - by Aion - 05-27-2015, 03:10 AM
    RE: STS, trying to understand - by Lighthead - 05-27-2015, 11:58 AM
    RE: STS, trying to understand - by ayadew - 10-18-2009, 02:16 PM
    RE: STS, trying to understand - by ayadew - 10-18-2009, 04:46 PM
    RE: STS, trying to understand - by Sacred Fool - 10-19-2009, 12:51 AM
    RE: STS, trying to understand - by Turtle - 10-19-2009, 04:26 AM
    RE: STS, trying to understand - by Sacred Fool - 10-19-2009, 11:28 AM
    RE: STS, trying to understand - by Lavazza - 10-19-2009, 01:09 PM
    RE: STS, trying to understand - by Ali Quadir - 10-19-2009, 03:44 PM
    RE: STS, trying to understand - by Sacred Fool - 10-19-2009, 03:46 PM
    RE: STS, trying to understand - by βαθμιαίος - 10-19-2009, 05:58 PM
    RE: STS, trying to understand - by Sacred Fool - 10-19-2009, 07:16 PM
    RE: STS, trying to understand - by βαθμιαίος - 10-19-2009, 07:27 PM
    RE: STS, trying to understand - by Turtle - 10-19-2009, 09:54 PM
    RE: STS, trying to understand - by Lavazza - 10-19-2009, 06:00 PM
    RE: STS, trying to understand - by pphuck - 10-20-2009, 07:36 AM
    RE: STS, trying to understand - by pphuck - 10-19-2009, 01:45 PM
    RE: STS, trying to understand - by ubergud - 10-20-2009, 07:55 PM
    RE: STS, trying to understand - by Lavazza - 10-20-2009, 08:09 PM
    RE: STS, trying to understand - by βαθμιαίος - 10-20-2009, 08:16 PM
    RE: STS, trying to understand - by Sacred Fool - 10-20-2009, 08:24 PM
    RE: STS, trying to understand - by βαθμιαίος - 10-20-2009, 08:51 PM
    RE: STS, trying to understand - by Monica - 10-22-2009, 11:03 PM
    RE: STS, trying to understand - by Lavazza - 10-23-2009, 12:06 PM
    RE: STS, trying to understand - by Turtle - 10-23-2009, 01:28 PM
    RE: STS, trying to understand - by ubergud - 10-23-2009, 04:12 PM
    RE: STS, trying to understand - by Monica - 10-23-2009, 06:49 PM
    RE: STS, trying to understand - by pphuck - 10-24-2009, 05:51 AM
    RE: STS, trying to understand - by pphuck - 10-24-2009, 06:56 AM
    RE: STS, trying to understand - by Sacred Fool - 10-25-2009, 03:56 PM
    RE: STS, trying to understand - by pphuck - 10-28-2009, 07:58 AM
    RE: STS, trying to understand - by Sacred Fool - 10-23-2009, 01:19 AM
    RE: STS, trying to understand - by Monica - 10-23-2009, 05:49 PM
    RE: STS, trying to understand - by Sacred Fool - 10-23-2009, 07:51 PM
    RE: STS, trying to understand - by Monica - 10-24-2009, 04:47 AM
    RE: STS, trying to understand - by ubergud - 10-26-2009, 01:07 PM
    RE: STS, trying to understand - by Lavazza - 10-26-2009, 01:11 PM
    RE: STS, trying to understand - by ubergud - 10-26-2009, 02:24 PM
    RE: STS, trying to understand - by ayadew - 10-26-2009, 02:55 PM
    RE: STS, trying to understand - by ubergud - 10-28-2009, 04:28 PM
    RE: STS, trying to understand - by Turtle - 10-28-2009, 03:09 PM
    RE: STS, trying to understand - by Questioner - 10-28-2009, 05:16 PM
    RE: STS, trying to understand - by Sacred Fool - 10-28-2009, 05:56 PM
    RE: STS, trying to understand - by Monica - 10-28-2009, 08:14 PM
    RE: STS, trying to understand - by Questioner - 10-28-2009, 08:28 PM
    RE: STS, trying to understand - by Questioner - 10-30-2009, 01:57 PM
    RE: STS, trying to understand - by Sacred Fool - 10-30-2009, 04:21 PM
    RE: STS, trying to understand - by Questioner - 10-31-2009, 02:38 PM
    RE: STS, trying to understand - by Sacred Fool - 10-31-2009, 08:17 PM
    RE: STS, trying to understand - by Richard - 10-30-2009, 04:35 PM
    RE: STS, trying to understand - by Questioner - 10-31-2009, 09:12 PM
    RE: STS, trying to understand - by sylverone - 11-06-2009, 02:05 AM
    RE: STS, trying to understand - by Questioner - 11-06-2009, 11:08 AM
    RE: STS, trying to understand - by Lavazza - 11-06-2009, 12:44 PM
    RE: STS, trying to understand - by pphuck - 11-07-2009, 12:08 PM
    RE: STS, trying to understand - by Peregrinus - 11-07-2009, 01:58 PM
    RE: STS, trying to understand - by sylverone - 11-07-2009, 09:06 PM
    RE: STS, trying to understand - by Questioner - 11-07-2009, 09:21 PM
    RE: STS, trying to understand - by pphuck - 11-08-2009, 12:56 AM
    RE: STS, trying to understand - by sylverone - 11-10-2009, 01:40 PM
    RE: STS, trying to understand - by ExperiencedGhost - 11-22-2009, 01:55 PM
    RE: STS, trying to understand - by thefool - 12-14-2009, 05:48 PM

    • View a Printable Version
    • Subscribe to this thread

    © Template Design by D&D - Powered by MyBB

    Connect with L/L Research on Social Media

    Linear Mode
    Threaded Mode