(10-27-2011, 09:18 PM)ƒ❤losopher Wrote: One should always bear in mind, however, that he's a bit of a cult-leader with his absolute belief in his infallibility in applying kinesiology.A.K. is only capable of accurately testing according to the relative balance of the practitioner. There are always unconscious motivations (should see's) which will skew results.
(10-27-2011, 10:37 PM)Icaro Wrote: I get the feeling that he simply wants to stop short of any personal opinion, because then he is no longer passively teaching about consciousness, but rather moving into the realm of social commentary. It's as if he wants to remain "clean".Most who talk about what will happen have been wrong. You're basically substituting wish-fulfilliment for what may actually be more viable or healthy for society. Then you start to become an embarrassed false-prophet like Calleman. As we see plainly in this forum, the intuition can be way overextended to the point of only serving to reinforce "stage props" for hopes (ooooh, I resonate with that it must be true). But this overextension is inevitably not congruent with reality, so what good does it do?
Any change related to moneyless society, or everyone contributing equally, or whatever would not be effective without transparency of values between individuals and between society and the individual. That would mean transparency of mind. If we don't have such a shared consensus readily "on tap" it can't happen.