10-29-2011, 04:20 AM
I actually like Tom's (author) articles. I've been following the Gnosis series of articles and I think many here would enjoy the seventh article. Personally, I liked the eighth, on polar mythology- he managed to get to the core of the matter in a revealing way, cutting through morass of prevailing thought. It was educational for me. The other reason I found it enjoyable was that it allows one to play the game of corresponding much of the content of 'directed' mythology to the archetypes on a beyond-individual scale.
Also, his ideas on physics are great, again his ability to sort the wheat from the chaff is exceptional and understanding is always gained. He has a multitude of other topics which he addresses with a refreshing clarity and intelligence.
Lastly, one question that comes up here is, does it serve one to approach a source of information with the intent of seeing if it stands up to attack? What happened to the spirit of seeking truth, wherever one may find it? I have gained understanding and perspective from his info, just as I do from people here on this forum. I don't see how he is different in that respect.
Thank you Tenet.
Also, his ideas on physics are great, again his ability to sort the wheat from the chaff is exceptional and understanding is always gained. He has a multitude of other topics which he addresses with a refreshing clarity and intelligence.
Lastly, one question that comes up here is, does it serve one to approach a source of information with the intent of seeing if it stands up to attack? What happened to the spirit of seeking truth, wherever one may find it? I have gained understanding and perspective from his info, just as I do from people here on this forum. I don't see how he is different in that respect.
Thank you Tenet.