10-20-2009, 08:16 PM
(10-20-2009, 07:55 PM)ubergud Wrote: If STS is centered around separation (i.e. not unity) and STO is centered around heading toward unity, then if it takes 51% STO or 95% STS to gain sufficient polarization to 'graduate' to 4D ... if STS were to attempt to maintain separation, wouldn't preventing either 51%STO or 95%STS be the STS goal ... i.e. if entities ('i.e. en mass in the Earth environment') were tempted into a state where they never polarized ... that would be a kind of permanent limbo state ... which in essence would in space-time appear to be perpetual separation (i.e. lack of choice) ... which makes the percentages ... odd ... (well, they are odd ... but ... strange :-P). However, this tends to create a wrinkle or paradox in the concept of Free Will in my estimation ...
Interesting thoughts. They reminded me of the following mildly baffling (why must the information be withheld?) answers from Ra:
Session 16 Wrote:Questioner: Can you tell me what percentage of [the aware planets in our galaxy] are third, fourth, fifth, sixth etc., density?
Ra: I am Ra. A percentage seventeen for first density, a percentage twenty for second density, a percentage twenty-seven for third density, a percentage sixteen for fourth density, a percentage six for fifth density. The other information must be withheld.
...snip...
Questioner: Can you tell me what percentage of the third-, fourth-, and fifth-density planets which you have spoken of here are polarized negatively towards service to self?
Ra: I am Ra. This is not a query to which we may speak given the Law of Confusion.