10-25-2009, 03:38 PM
By the way, if you haven't kept up with David's material because of all the negative conspiracy material, you might find the Coast segment and follow-up to be more to your taste. These days he seems to have a generally uplifting, hopeful message about positive changes occurring all around us at this time.
Alright then, I'll repeat my question about David here. I am trying to understand an apparent difference between how Carla Rueckert and David Wilcock each got started with channeling.
On to my question.
Carla intended to channel, didn't know who would show up to use her service, and so she had a challenge for entities. She asked herself what was the highest and best she could imagine, the ultimate truth worth living and dying for. For her, this was the unconditional love of the Christ consciousness, as demonstrated by but not exclusive to Jesus. Before accepting the Ra contact, she insisted that she would only channel an entity that affirmed this love, three times. Ra did affirm, so Carla let Ra channel through her.
If I understand David's history, he had no intention or desire to channel, but he had been increasingly hearing/feeling the voice/guidance he later identified as his own higher self, the same higher self of Cayce who David sees as his own earlier lifetime. As far as I know, David has never channeled any other entity than his version of Ra.
Now maybe I'm mistaken about any of that, if so I'd welcome more informed perspective. If I do understand this right, my question is: has David ever challenged his own version of Ra with Carla's same channel? Has he asked that his own Ra contact affirm the unconditional love of Christ consciousness, or whatever else David might think of as even more important? Or has he just relied on his own feelings or analysis to show him that the contact is valid and brings the truth?
I don't mean any disrespect, I simply want to understand some of the differences in process between his work and Carla's.
Alright then, I'll repeat my question about David here. I am trying to understand an apparent difference between how Carla Rueckert and David Wilcock each got started with channeling.
On to my question.
Carla intended to channel, didn't know who would show up to use her service, and so she had a challenge for entities. She asked herself what was the highest and best she could imagine, the ultimate truth worth living and dying for. For her, this was the unconditional love of the Christ consciousness, as demonstrated by but not exclusive to Jesus. Before accepting the Ra contact, she insisted that she would only channel an entity that affirmed this love, three times. Ra did affirm, so Carla let Ra channel through her.
If I understand David's history, he had no intention or desire to channel, but he had been increasingly hearing/feeling the voice/guidance he later identified as his own higher self, the same higher self of Cayce who David sees as his own earlier lifetime. As far as I know, David has never channeled any other entity than his version of Ra.
Now maybe I'm mistaken about any of that, if so I'd welcome more informed perspective. If I do understand this right, my question is: has David ever challenged his own version of Ra with Carla's same channel? Has he asked that his own Ra contact affirm the unconditional love of Christ consciousness, or whatever else David might think of as even more important? Or has he just relied on his own feelings or analysis to show him that the contact is valid and brings the truth?
I don't mean any disrespect, I simply want to understand some of the differences in process between his work and Carla's.