10-25-2009, 08:15 PM
(10-25-2009, 03:38 PM)Bring4th_Steve Wrote: To me, I would appreciate and value channelers who think enough to employ such a thorough level of checks and balances.
If the "source" is truly interested in the well-being of the channeler, then it would mention such arrangement.
The other lamentation is the distortion of the original message once received. Once the message is received, there is great possibility the message would be so distorted the conveyed words have different meaning from (the source).
The L/L team have done wonderful work to encode these messages without distortion.
