Federation of Light

[Monica]

Oops! Yes I see that now in the guidelines post... I don't want to violate any established rules. If so, I'll be happy to disband the thread.

Thanks for your kind words, Dreaming. I'm very happy to be awake If you're interested in reading some of the FOL channeling let me know and I'll dig up some of what I consider to be more of the insightful ones. The messages feel altruistic, although I agree that it's always good to keep a wary eye open at all times. The mass landing prediction will always be a little questionable to me I guess, in terms of what it all was supposed to mean. But regardless, I've gotten some real helpful bits of info from that source, including some of which helped me decide to meditate on a daily basis.

I think you've got some great insight about the alien abduction scenarios. I read from yet another source (that I won't mention here per forum rules) that some times when this happens it is agreed upon by the person's higher self or over soul, not necessarily the conscious personality. In which case, there is no violation of free will.

Back to the FOL issue- is there perhaps a list somewhere that has been compiled of sources that work in accordance with the Law of One? It seems to me that Ra and Q'uo are probably not the only positively oriented entities / complexes that have contacted us here on Earth. There's a podcast called 'The Sons of the Law of One' that presents material like this from many sources. The precondition being that it is in complete accordance with LOO. It'd be great to find a list like that- Maybe I need to start it? From my perspective as a newbie, it can sometimes be really confusing separating the 'legit' from the 'less-than-legit'. Then again, I wouldn't want to be presenting my list as an authority of what is or is not right, so in that sense maybe it's not such a hot idea. Hmmmm...

Lavazza, I'm not a moderator, so this is just my opinion, but I don't think there's any reason to delete the post, as there are other posts scattered throughout the forum that briefly mention other sources. And I doubt that the mods want us to be paranoid about ever mentioning other sources at all! My impression was that they just didn't want us to get into deep discussions about other sources, analyzing them, quoting them, etc. because that would dilute the purpose of this forum...not to mention add a lot of confusion to those who might not be familiar with the material!

As for a list, I can't be much help on that either. Not even Ra or Q'uo are willing to put themselves in positions of authority...but would rather we discern for ourselves, for that is part of the process.

It might be beneficial to list the sources that have been explicitly approved by Ra/Q'uo, such as a source mentioned by Steve (Joshiah), I would think, but that's a question for the mods.

It's the sources not explicitly approved that are particularly subject to our individual discernment (well, all of it, really).

Hope that helps...somewhat!