10-26-2009, 04:51 AM
(10-25-2009, 08:20 PM)Whitefeather Wrote: Regarding the polarization of suns or planets, I understood so far from Ra, that a 'polarized planet' was a term used to indicate the dominant polarity of the inhabitants and conscious living beings of a planet (sentient beings), because, after all, we are a planetary consciousness.
Apparently, it is not actually the planet herself which polarizes but her inhabitants, who represent her consciousness... us mainly!
I'm also interpreting Ra as stating that a planetary entity does not polarize; but that's not the same thing as not having a polarity.
Ra Wrote:29.10 Questioner: Do the sub-Logoi such as our sun have a metaphysical polarity positive or negative as we have been using the term?
Ra: I am Ra. As you use the term, this is not so. Entities through the level of planetary have the strength of intelligent infinity through the use of free will, going through the actions of beingness. The polarity is not thusly as you understand polarity. It is only when the planetary sphere begins harmonically interacting with mind/body complexes, and more especially mind/body/spirit complexes, that planetary spheres take on distortions due to the thought complexes of entities interacting with the planetary entity. The creation of the One Infinite Creator does not have the polarity you speak of.
It would seem that Ra stresses the point that a planetary entity does not have the same kind of polarity as you or me or any other entity living in its sphere of influence. I read this as stating that a planetary entity does have some kind of polarity on its own.