GNM

[biknewb]

Hello Bik, I am willing to discuss with you the apparent similarities and differences between Law of One and German New Medicine. I am not an expert in either field, but I have done a fair amount of study about both texts, and about related metaphysical and holistic health ideas from other sources.

I would guess your user name is "Bik the Newbie?"

This is quite correct. As my learn/teaching continues I hope to become "bikpro" eventually

Let's start with "the first biological law," from the site you linked.

First criterion:

GNM refers to conflict shock or a DHS as "an emotionally distressful situation that we could not anticipate and for which we were not prepared."

From a physical point of view, I can understand how we can be utterly unprepared for a surprising, overwhelming shock.

Yet from a metaphysical view, there is the point of view that catalyst is brought into our lives by our higher selves, and is never more than we can handle for our spiritual evolution. Thus right from the start, there is a potential conflict between Law of One and GNM.

The way I see it, catalyst is offered for us to accept with our free will. If at first we do not accept it with the mind complex, a second chance is offered to process it in the form of the discomfort associated with a "disease". I see no conflict.
We could develop our state of mind so that it lessens the chance of a shock to surprise us. In that case we will be able to process the catalyst in the mind complex. And like you, I am convinced the amount of catalyst offered is within our ability to handle it.
A clever higher self will foresee both chances and adjust the offered catalyst accordingly.

Second criterion:

GNM points out that conflicting or negative events can have different effects depending on how we interpret them and assign meaning. "We can suffer these conflicts also in a figurative sense. For example, a “territorial loss conflict” can translate into the loss of a home or a workplace, an “attack conflict” can be experienced through an offending remark, an “abandonment conflict” can be caused by feeling isolated and excluded from “the pack”, or a “death-fright conflict” can be triggered by a diagnosis shock that is perceived as a death-sentence....

If, for example, a woman is unexpectedly faced with a separation from her partner, this does not necessarily mean that she suffers a “separation conflict” in biological terms. The DHS can also be experienced as an “abandonment conflict” (affecting the kidneys, or a “self-devaluation conflict” (affecting the bones, resulting potentially in osteoporosis, or a “loss conflict” (affecting the ovaries). Also, what one person experiences as a “self-devaluation conflict”, can be experienced quite differently by another person. For a third person the event could be totally irrelevant."

I believe that Law of One, and most psychologists, sociologists, anthropologists, therapists, spiritual seekers and channeled sources, would all agree with the idea that what matters most is not the "catalyst" itself, but our interpretations and responses.

I also think that therapists would emphasize that these interpretations may come from conditioned or unconscious reactions that associate events with what they "have to" mean to us. While some metaphysical teachers would extend these associations to distressing, perhaps even life-ending, experiences in past lives. I don't see that GNM addresses the source of these emotional associations, only their effects on the person once triggered.

That is right. GNM is mainly concerned with the biological program set in motion by the event. It is a medical science, not a psychological one.

Third criterion:

"The psyche, the brain, and the corresponding organ are three levels of ONE unified organism that always works in synchronicity." I think Ra would totally agree, since Ra referred to individual people as "mind/body/spirit complexes."

Therefore, an illness reaction is, to GNM, "an unexpected, highly acute, and isolating conflict shock that occurs simultaneously in the PSYCHE, the BRAIN, and on the corresponding ORGAN." I think that Law of One would agree that a single event could manifest in these multiple levels.

You identified one of the parrallels I noticed

Additional concepts in this page:

"Special biological programs" are inherent within human physiology, to deal with extreme situations of loss, threat, etc. Not sure if that concept is dealt with at all in Law of One.

These programs are run automatically when there is a perception of a very extreme circumstance. As discussed above, what triggers this perception/interpretation may be different for different people. Law of One does deal with the importance of how we interpret events, but I don't know if it refers to automatic/conditioned responses rather than our conscious interpretations of freewill choice.

The running of these programs can be measured as rings in CT images of the brain. I don't think Ra discussed anything of the type. In addition, it is hard to evaluate this GNM claim since there is apparently only one document, in German, outside of GNM material that addresses this claim.

This is the most remarkable of the GNM claims. These rings on CT scans are not following the shape of the brain, they do not even respect the left/right boundary. The centre indicates the place in the body where the biological part of the program is developing. You could send your CT scan to dr Hamer for interpretation and he would send you a description of your symptoms and the conflict that caused it. He has analyzed tens of thousands of scans and seems to be right all the time.

Well there is some catalyst for your consideration, I hope none of it was too shocking or more than you could handle.

I survived and am thankfull for your reaction.