10-27-2009, 05:36 AM
(10-26-2009, 07:50 PM)Questioner Wrote: First biological law: I think there is a way to resolve this GNM principle with Law of One, if we add one little phrase that refers to your ideas.
"an emotionally distressful situation that we could not anticipate and for which we were not prepared." - with our current level of conscious awareness. That leaves open the possibility that our higher self hoped to get the message to us in a less painful way, and is still limiting the catalyst to what we can handle.
Agreed, this addition eliminates confusion.
Quote:I also find the CT rings difficult to understand and believe in. What I wonder is whether GNM may have some useful insights even if Dr. Hamer is wrong about the CT images.
The CT rings are technically unbelievable. But they seem to remain visible in the brain after a conflict is resolved, as neuroglia tissue.
The most useful to me is the revelation that what we usually call disease is in fact the healing phase of a biologically usefull reaction of the body. This insight takes away fear by changing the status of pain and discomfort from signs of decay into signs of hope.
Quote:By the way, I find it kind of confusing that one "biological law" actually includes half a dozen different concepts and interactions. Is it just me or is that kind of an unfortunate choice of terminology?
You mean the First Law? It is more like a complete law library.
Sorry, I didn't invent it.