10-27-2009, 10:26 AM
(This post was last modified: 10-27-2009, 10:39 AM by Questioner.)
GLB, thank you for the detailed reply.
I came across "A channeling handbook," but I didn't do more than skim it. I do not want to try to be a channel, in the L/L Research sense of the term, at this time. For the same reason I entirely skipped the channeling intensive transcript.
It makes sense that Carla's channeling guidebooks would contain her guidance about her channeling process. So thanks for pointing those out. I can go read them more attentively to help me understand her process.
So the teaching and learning continues. I imagine that means that I should be aware that material in the older handbooks and courses might have been superseded by later developments.
I did pick up on that.
I apologize for my use of the word "junk." I felt too rushed to think about a better word. With more consideration, maybe it would be better to say something like, "less focused or helpful material as received, due to increased distortion in the communication process."
Jim McCarty's book V quote on alignments was the one tickling the back of my mind.
I had unfortunately glossed over that in my earlier reading. That passage has some deep wisdom that is very resonant for me right now, as I ponder some important but transient issues and decisions in my life. It is a timely and beautiful reminder for me to "seek first the Kingdom of God." Thank you for including that passage.
I share your admiration for the work and the workers, the people and entities involved in the L/L Research investigations. I recognize that imperfections and misunderstandings are more likely to occur in my own limitations at this time.
Carrie, thank you for answering my questions.
I wonder if you might have an opportunity, in the future, to work with a team that can help you document your information, as has happened with L/L Research.
That's what I most wondered about, if it was your own interpretation from observing the Ra material or if it came through a channeling process. Thanks for clearing that up for me.
Only to the extent that I wasn't sure whether the information was from Carla, Ra, or your own process, and now I thank you for making that obvious.
Please don't feel any burden about that on behalf of my questions. The material Carla has already brought forth may well take me the rest of this life time to work through.
I completely agree.
Steve,
That makes sense. I see that this also honors Carla's intention more than re-using her exact words. If other people are not also mystical Christians, they have a different language of inspiration or ideas about ultimate love.
I had seen those precautions. At this time, I have more than enough material to consider with what has already been brought forth; and my life has already been turned upside down enough so that I won't seek an additional shake. Thanks for looking out for my safety and I hope that your reminder will save someone else some trouble, too.
I came across "A channeling handbook," but I didn't do more than skim it. I do not want to try to be a channel, in the L/L Research sense of the term, at this time. For the same reason I entirely skipped the channeling intensive transcript.
It makes sense that Carla's channeling guidebooks would contain her guidance about her channeling process. So thanks for pointing those out. I can go read them more attentively to help me understand her process.
Quote:Incidentally L/L Research just concluded a workshop yesterday
So the teaching and learning continues. I imagine that means that I should be aware that material in the older handbooks and courses might have been superseded by later developments.
Quote:The inspiration for challenging came from Carla’s beloved holy book.
I did pick up on that.
Quote:never have I seen a shred of evidence to indicate that Ra had been displaced by a negatively oriented entity aping Ra.
I apologize for my use of the word "junk." I felt too rushed to think about a better word. With more consideration, maybe it would be better to say something like, "less focused or helpful material as received, due to increased distortion in the communication process."
Jim McCarty's book V quote on alignments was the one tickling the back of my mind.
Quote: It’s worth emphasizing that anything measurable is also transient.
I had unfortunately glossed over that in my earlier reading. That passage has some deep wisdom that is very resonant for me right now, as I ponder some important but transient issues and decisions in my life. It is a timely and beautiful reminder for me to "seek first the Kingdom of God." Thank you for including that passage.
I share your admiration for the work and the workers, the people and entities involved in the L/L Research investigations. I recognize that imperfections and misunderstandings are more likely to occur in my own limitations at this time.
Carrie, thank you for answering my questions.
Quote:Most of the things are from memory and past. It has been many, many years since then, and it was unfortunate most answers I received and questions asked were not meticulously noted down as in LOO.
I wonder if you might have an opportunity, in the future, to work with a team that can help you document your information, as has happened with L/L Research.
Quote:The protocol given, was suggested format, given by [source] to ensure purity of the material transmitted.
That's what I most wondered about, if it was your own interpretation from observing the Ra material or if it came through a channeling process. Thanks for clearing that up for me.
Quote:If I do interfere with this question being asked, I am sorry.
Only to the extent that I wasn't sure whether the information was from Carla, Ra, or your own process, and now I thank you for making that obvious.
Quote:I will try to ask [source] for more information when time permits. It will take some preparations and time given my busy schedule.
Please don't feel any burden about that on behalf of my questions. The material Carla has already brought forth may well take me the rest of this life time to work through.
Quote:The net result of all of this, I am deeply humbled, and try every day to live the LOO. It is easier said than done.
I completely agree.
Steve,
Quote:That's a great question, but if it were me, I would not approach it this way. I would first ask the channeler to challenge the entity in the highest form of love that the channeler knows of. That way, you *know* the information is going to be love-based and most probably with minimal distortions.
That makes sense. I see that this also honors Carla's intention more than re-using her exact words. If other people are not also mystical Christians, they have a different language of inspiration or ideas about ultimate love.
Quote:I will mention this... PLEASE do not channel on your own! It is a very dangerous proposition. It's like playing roulette. You may get lucky and attract a loving entity, but you also may attract a sly entity who at first says loving things but slowly begins slipping in negative or fear-based statements without you noticing. Before you know it, you'd be totally detuned.
Carla asks, and I agree 100% on this, that we should only consciously channel our higher Selves. If we do decide to channel outside of ourselves...
I had seen those precautions. At this time, I have more than enough material to consider with what has already been brought forth; and my life has already been turned upside down enough so that I won't seek an additional shake. Thanks for looking out for my safety and I hope that your reminder will save someone else some trouble, too.