11-02-2009, 01:23 PM
I shall simply echo Terence McKenna: "The most improbable theory of improbabilities has to be the Big Bang."
Ra claims that the world is built of cycles, where each density has unique cycles. In the 3rd density illusion of time it would seem that it started somewhere and will end somewhere. The only negatory force of the great expansion of the universe is the gravity, but it's also one of the few forces that is self-sufficient, ie 'eternal'.
So if there was a big bang there shall surely be a big crunch. This is cyclic.
3rd law of newton's motion: Whenever a first body exerts a force F on a second body, the second body exerts a force −F on the first body. F and −F are equal in magnitude and opposite in direction.
This implies that there is a negative system (-F) which is polar to our (F).
This requires a closed system though, and the creation is infinite...
No, modern physics is our greatest invention and most monumental failure it its attempt to define everything by ignoring everything.
The big bang theory is fundamentally rejected in my world
Ra claims that the world is built of cycles, where each density has unique cycles. In the 3rd density illusion of time it would seem that it started somewhere and will end somewhere. The only negatory force of the great expansion of the universe is the gravity, but it's also one of the few forces that is self-sufficient, ie 'eternal'.
So if there was a big bang there shall surely be a big crunch. This is cyclic.
3rd law of newton's motion: Whenever a first body exerts a force F on a second body, the second body exerts a force −F on the first body. F and −F are equal in magnitude and opposite in direction.
This implies that there is a negative system (-F) which is polar to our (F).
This requires a closed system though, and the creation is infinite...
No, modern physics is our greatest invention and most monumental failure it its attempt to define everything by ignoring everything.
The big bang theory is fundamentally rejected in my world