(11-09-2009, 03:53 PM)Bring4th_Monica Wrote: Interesting...when I first read your post, my mind inserted a 'not' and I read 'does not have that sensationally glamorous aspect' and found myself agreeing with you! Then I realized my mistake!
I find the other channeled sources to be much more 'glamorous' and the Law of One to be without hype...just sure and steady and full of substance.
But I guess it all depends on what we might consider glamorous!
What I was trying to say didn't come out right at all. My apologies. I do not find the material to be pretentious or intentionally glamorous. In fact, it's just the opposite, and that has been largely what has drawn me to it. I only meant that I was blown away by all of it, sometimes to the point of overload, it seemed. But as to Hoagland, I have read all of his books, and I still do not know what to make of him. He is either a true courageous whistleblower, or he is seriously delusional. I honestly do not know which.