12-15-2011, 01:59 AM
(12-15-2011, 01:11 AM)Conifer16 Wrote: How does that have anything to do with what whitefeather wrote?
What does what whitefeather wrote have to do with understanding 6D STO or STS state of being and actions? i.e. "...the nature of the energy transfer is a determinant factor for polarization. As a common example, judging someone means sending them negative energy therefore, it is an STS action. While compassionate and caring feelings, even at a distance is nurturing and giving, therefore it is STO." (we all get it - 3D STO nurturing and accepting vs STS dominance and control).
Ra refused to comment on the nature of 6D negative, due to our misunderstanding of polarity - and the inevitable confusion resulting in attempting to introduce concepts which would be highjacked, hopelessly misunderstood, and grossly distorted. There would be consequences - "infringement".
We are still learning "ethics" in 3D. And as Ra said, "It is unlikely that there is a more pithy or eloquent description of the polarities of third density than service-to-others and service-to-self due to the nature of the mind/body/spirit complexes’ distortions towards perceiving concepts relating to philosophy in terms of ethics or activity."
Whitefeather would probably claim an ethical standard beyond 3D (i.e. "heart" vs "mind"), and from such a transcendental standpoint, interpret 6D polarity. I'd say whitefeather is completely incapable of apprehending, via heart or otherwise, the polarizing conditions, actual ethical considerations, of anything beyond vague 3D notions. Speculation may lead somewhere, but that's not what was provided.