Unbelievable moonbases and wrong science

[βαθμιαίος]

Where do these interpretations stem from, why are they needed? Is there a need (forgive me if I am dead wrong, it looks this way to me) for the Ra contact to be 100% absolutely correct in everything that was communicated, even for the extremely fringe material where 100% accuracy is not needed, i.e. government secrets? It would seem to indicate that if Ra were indeed proven wrong it would mean something detrimental regarding the remaining non-transient information to some? Perhaps instead of adhering to one source for spiritual information as the absolute truth it would be helpful to cast a larger net out in to the spiritual world to see what the rest of creation has to say on the topic?

My dear Lavazza,

Thank you for your feedback. I don't feel that I need the Ra information we have been discussing in this thread to be true; I just think that it's likely that it is. Each of us must make our own determinations about what we believe, and I certainly respect your right not to believe this information. I do wonder, though, if perhaps your question could be turned back towards you. Do you by any chance need the information not to be true, perhaps because it might unsettle much of what you believe you know about the world?

With regard to your point about casting a wider net, I have posted some links from the wider world that show that there is evidence to be found that what Ra said might have some validity. I recognize that the claims have not been proven and that we are unlikely to have definitive answers until fourth density comes and the veil is lifted.

In the meantime, I am content to consider Ra's claims as possible/probable vortices while I focus on what I consider to be important in the Law of One material and in life in general: love/light, balance, radiance, acceptance, forgiveness, unity, etc.

Love and light,
βαθμιαίος