Question on: Favorite Quotes from the Law of One Sessions

[Ankh]

Ra is implying here that training is required, not in order to heal, but in order to consistently heal without causing distortion (maintaining some degree of balance and fidelity to service) in themselves and others.

Yes, that plus in order for those who wish to serve others by distortion of healing, dependently, to consciously and carefully open the door to intelligent infinity.

It is apparently not straightforward to always make changes with the consideration of another's (a unique-other's) 'highest good', without such training. And the would-be healer is also necessarily working on part of themselves in the process of healing. The impression one gets of another's condition (be it harmonious or disharmonious) must necessarily be interpreted from the standpoint one's relative balance.

I am of an understanding that you can heal whatever you wish to heal, but if the distortions are not accepted by the entity who is to be healed, there is no way that you could heal these distortions:

The role of the healer is to offer an opportunity for realignment or aid in realignment of either energy centers or some connection between the energies of mind and body, spirit and mind, or spirit and body. This latter is very rare.

The seeker will then have the reciprocal opportunity to accept a novel view of the self, a variant arrangement of patterns of energy influx. If the entity, at any level, desires to remain in the configuration of distortion which seems to need healing it will do so. If, upon the other hand, the seeker chooses the novel configuration, it is done through free will.

This is one great difficulty with other forms of energy transfer in that they do not carry through the process of free will as this process is not native to yellow-ray.

The healer does not heal. The crystallized healer is a channel for intelligent energy which offers an opportunity to an entity that it might heal itself.

In no case is there an other description of healing. Therefore, there is no difference as long as the healer never approaches one whose request for aid has not come to it previously. This is also true of the more conventional healers of your culture and if these healers could but fully realize that they are responsible only for offering the opportunity of healing, and not for the healing, many of these entities would feel an enormous load of misconceived responsibility fall from them.

We might note further that when the one wishing to be healed, though sincere, remains unhealed, as you call this distortion, you may consider pre-incarnative choices and your more helpful aid to such an entity may be the suggestion that it meditate upon the affirmative uses of whatever limitations it might experience.

Thus, in my understanding, it is a misbelief that a healer may do any changes in another self, that are not "good" for this entity.

So to sum it up, there are people that can and do naturally heal (the 'miraculous', intelligent-infinity method), without any training. But if they go about that work, lacking training, it may be difficult to do in a harmonious manner (without causing undue distortion for themselves and for others).

It seems so considering the quote you posted, in regards to those who are not asking for training.

For those who do, Ra is pointing out some kind of responsibility as an interesting item. Perhaps you are responsible to understand what you are asking for, perhaps there is also the Law of Responsibility that is in question here. If you ask for healing, then you get responsible for practicing what you learn, to live what you have been given in understandings/seeingness? But Ra also stated, in your quote, that it is possible to cause disharmony in other selves (that is of course concerns those who are not asking for training, in that quote).

This is what I could dig out concerning responsibility anyway:

Ra equals responsibility to honor (16:40)

I am Ra. Each responsibility is an honor; each honor, a responsibility.

The Ways of Responsibility are also described as follows (34:17):

...the rejection of the Law or Way of Responsibility; that is, seeing universal love, yet still it fought on.

This particular Law exists therefore not only in regards to healing, but in each entity's experience. As soon as it learns something, this entity either accepts this learning/demonstrating it in action, or rejects it. Rejecting this Law, which Ra call also as the ways of honor/duty, is what caused us a decreased life span (22:5):

Without demonstrating the fruits of such learn/teaching the life span became greatly reduced, for the ways of honor/duty were not being accepted.

In regards to healing the responsibility, besides the quote in question, is mentioned in 5:2:

In each entity there exists completeness. Thus, the ability to understand each balance is necessary. When you view patience, you are responsible for mirroring in your mental understanding, patience/impatience. When you view impatience, it is necessary for your mental configuration of understanding to be impatience/patience.

I am still a bit confused regarding this whole topic in order to sum this properly up, but it will hopefully come in time.

---

It was advised in several ways for healers to just be themselves, and let others seek healing.

Ra

True healing is simply the radiance of the self