12-28-2011, 04:09 AM
I've heard the "devil's horn sign" traces back through latin based languages. Google/Image this one word: cornuto + your pick of the politicians or groupies
I find the related subjects interesting, though, indeed a lot of speculation goes into making connections.... From my most recent reading of a paper book... The following quote comes from a human-identity which is not entirely clear, though published by Bridger House Publisher, Inc 1998:
The Spiritual Laws and Lessons Of The Universe
One of it's "Laws of Balance" reads:
17. Evil (Adversaries of God) Must Always Wear A Sign of Their Evilness
(By Their Fruits Ye Shall Know Them)
As to the controllers of Congress, one can search-surmise much here:
"American Legislative Exchange Council"
One of my hopes is to learn more of the whole planetary-game-system. As to how it's 'laws' work. Why the polarities seem so horribly foul, in terms of pillaging, scorched earth policies, double speak of governance, media-hypnotics, virtual-slaveries, etc....
Is it possible that devilish mayhem is "to be expected", so long as evil doers wear the visible sign of their own evilness? Is this sort of a plausible deniability? In the final analysis, the evil doer simply says "well, we told you so and you voted our evil-doers into office". "You broke it, you bought it".
I find the related subjects interesting, though, indeed a lot of speculation goes into making connections.... From my most recent reading of a paper book... The following quote comes from a human-identity which is not entirely clear, though published by Bridger House Publisher, Inc 1998:
The Spiritual Laws and Lessons Of The Universe
One of it's "Laws of Balance" reads:
17. Evil (Adversaries of God) Must Always Wear A Sign of Their Evilness
(By Their Fruits Ye Shall Know Them)
As to the controllers of Congress, one can search-surmise much here:
"American Legislative Exchange Council"
One of my hopes is to learn more of the whole planetary-game-system. As to how it's 'laws' work. Why the polarities seem so horribly foul, in terms of pillaging, scorched earth policies, double speak of governance, media-hypnotics, virtual-slaveries, etc....
Is it possible that devilish mayhem is "to be expected", so long as evil doers wear the visible sign of their own evilness? Is this sort of a plausible deniability? In the final analysis, the evil doer simply says "well, we told you so and you voted our evil-doers into office". "You broke it, you bought it".