01-16-2009, 05:07 AM
(01-14-2009, 08:09 PM)Lavazza Wrote: From my perspective as a newbie, it can sometimes be really confusing separating the 'legit' from the 'less-than-legit'.
One of the things I learned from Carla's channeling intensive is that challenging the entity in the name of love (or your highest idea of love) is a sure-fire way to qualify that an entity is legit. As it accepts the challenge and takes on your projection of love, you essentially are matching vibrations and will receive information in line with your own highest intention for the session you are entering into.
Everyone had awesome comments on here: a) any date-related material is a giveaway for mixed-polarity or even STS-based content, and b) just because someone starts out positive or sounds positive doesn't mean they will continue on that path.
Personally, I make sure I put my mindset in the mode of being "entertained" while reading content that I am unsure of its purity. However, when I learn that any given channeler enters into a prayer and calls the highest vibration of love to bring Christ-conscious information across the veil, I fell very comfortable with paying closer attention, because almost always the messages contain no fear-based statements and they speak of principles of love instead of "transient" information tied to future events.
I used to really be into the DC material, and I'm glad to see so many people pumped on it. But what troubles me is that if you explore the content that the site supports, it is loaded with fear-based interviews, commentary, transient events, unsubstantiated claims, and in some unusual cases, commentary that seems to contradict material from the LOO series. So I would agree with other comments in this thread in that you really do have to be careful about what sources of info you subscribe to unless you have credible evidence that a strict challenging process is taking place against the channeled contact.
Steve