02-28-2012, 05:05 PM
(02-28-2012, 04:29 PM)hogey11 Wrote:(02-28-2012, 01:58 PM)ShinAr Wrote: Hogey,
Go clean your room!
*grumble grumble* okayyyyy.
Haha, you are sweet, hogey11. I enjoy reading your posts. The below post of yours...
(02-27-2012, 02:21 AM)hogey11 Wrote: mmmmmm semantics!!!
I, for one, would like to say that I don't care what anyone chooses to call it; I love you all and I love your choices. In this case, I haven't seen anybody running around preaching the sovereignty of Ra over the Law of One, so I don't quite understand what the problem is that this seems to be addressing...
am I the only one who sees it this way? this seems to be much ado about nothing. Is the community currently mistaking Ra as being the only source of the Law of One?
... reminded me of a joke a friend told me recently. We were discussing one topic in emails, and suddenly I was hit by this revelation, or realization, or whatever that was. So, when I sobered up a little bit, I asked this friend if I sounded like someone who just found Jesus to which he replied:
"Haha. No, you never sound like someone who has found Jesus. Except when you’re standing on the street corner telling passer-byes “Ra is the answer! Be saved! Spare your soul another SEVENTY-FIVE THOUSAND YEARS of third density!”
