03-04-2012, 10:23 AM
Two men are walking down a path and come upon a large block of ice and a large campfire. One sits on the block of ice and falls asleep. The other steps into the fire and is consumed by the flames. One is killed instanly while the other dies in his sleep. Hot or cold, do we judge them by their affect on human life or by their polarity?
Two men are walking down a path and come upon the same ice and fire. One man wants to take the sleeping man and toss him into the fire to provide warmth for himself. The other man takes the sleeping man and lays him near the fire to attempt to revive him despite his own being cold because the fire is dying down.
Do we judge the two by their intentions, or by their free will to experience different polarities?
Polarity is nothing more than opposites. There is nothing to judge between hot and cold other than their properties. However, human interaction and intention is very different than the impartiality of material property and polarity.
It is my understanding that the Ra material clearly points out that the Orion type is not in service to the welfare of the evolution and transcendense of the human being.
Two men are walking down a path and come upon the same ice and fire. One man wants to take the sleeping man and toss him into the fire to provide warmth for himself. The other man takes the sleeping man and lays him near the fire to attempt to revive him despite his own being cold because the fire is dying down.
Do we judge the two by their intentions, or by their free will to experience different polarities?
Polarity is nothing more than opposites. There is nothing to judge between hot and cold other than their properties. However, human interaction and intention is very different than the impartiality of material property and polarity.
It is my understanding that the Ra material clearly points out that the Orion type is not in service to the welfare of the evolution and transcendense of the human being.