(03-24-2012, 11:50 PM)Ankh Wrote: Hey Icaro,
Don't know if this is helpful, but here it is anyway:
Thank you. I'm not a big fan of Q'uo but this topic is starting to make more sense. Once a person dies to the self, and experiences what we could call true life for the first time, this is the beginning of understanding the "body" in its use towards service. An awakened being is no longer simply living life, but now has more specific function. Because when Ra references the body in the tarot, they refer to it as that which will perform the work of the spirit.
So perhaps in understanding the body in each and every way through detachment, they mean learning to serve without developing a strong bias towards outcome. We serve through the body in a more purified way, channeling undistorted light as best as possible. It moves us around and is that which is used to create and teach. The body seems to simply be a communicator then. Going forward, when encountering catalyst we internalize all our understandings and provide the necessary response in a balanced manner. To not do so is misuse of the body. Even when trying to convey a positive message, feeling the need to show others the light or impose your position on another is not balanced as we know. You are channeling more of a dark light. I'm guilty of this, and have been toning it down.
Even-functioning seems to be the goal. We need to learn to be passive radiators as it's said, gently going about our work.
Using Carla as an example for instance because it's well-detailed, it's quite possible that in the incarnation before this one she might have been too imposing. 6d being the density of balance, this may cause her current lifetime to swing to the opposite side of the spectrum in an attempt to "hone in" if you will. This is reflected as a distorted body, seemingly representative of the harsh toll provided by her other self's domination and "abuse". Going along with this idea, previously having an imposing personality, in this incarnation she was required to balance unworthiness. Because previously, her self-worth would have been inflated, having developed the bias that others don't "get it", and thus not being an equal in terms of worthiness (respect).
So to have respect for someone, you need to let others think for themselves. Make offerings, and teach quietly.
Because if thoughts are things, I think the example of the two negative wanderers on Venus is imparting a highly important metaphor. They represent wisdom. In a society without language, the system of communication must have been through some type of mental image transfer or beigness/feeling that is sent. Somehow their specific knowledge's and wisdoms slaughtered others, as if their desire to "correct" others sent out a type of controlling energy. So I'm not sure that they even went around slaughtering anyone. It may just be an allegory for how imposing your will or wisdom on others is representative of domination, control, and most importantly, absorption.