Law of One Channeling

[Ankh]

There are no mistakes, but there are sure surprises, right?

In the ultimate sense, there are no mistakes under the Law of One. And yet:

Yahweh was of the Confederation but was mistaken in its attempts to aid.

Try reading the word in a different way... mis - take. As in... they attempted to communicate with earthlings, but their messages were mis - taken by them.

Yes, I agree. There are plenty other quotes in the material where Ra uses words like "mistaken", "error" and so on. I was thinking about balancing it with used statements such as there are no mistakes.

Then I'm curious to know... if it isn't Ra's responsibility, and it isn't humanity's responsibility... then whose responsibility is it? Ra says...

we then felt the great responsibility of staying in the capacity of removing the distortions and powers that had been given to the Law of One.

Ra have their own responsibility/honor for removing specific distortions. What I talked about was whom to blame, which, in my humble opinion, is unbalanced. I just wanted to be honest with you and said that I blamed humanity. Perhaps realization that it is unimportant who made which mistake, as we are one, is what is important? Responsibility/honor is different from that.

My sister, what you "see" and what is there, are often two different things. Might I make a gentle suggestion? We have been provided with a most excellent search tool at www.lawofone.info. When you have questions such as these, why not avail yourself of this tool before entering into debate/discussion in a thread? Is there perhaps a fear or unwillingness about "seeing" something different from what you want to believe?

I offered you my interpretation of the quote in our discussion. I am very familiar with a most excellent search tool at lawofone.info, which I use daily and nightly. I am sorry to hear that my interpretation is not enough to enter the debate/discussion in a thread. This is a community of studying the material, and that very interpretation, when offered by me, if/when offered, is there for everyone to dissect. The meaning of my offering of my own interpretation/s is to test if that interpretation is correct. The fear or unwillingness about "seeing" something different from what I want to believe is not what this is about. When the interpretation is challenged and another view or explanation is offered which resonates with me better, I feel a great joy of being illuminated even more in what is stated in this complicated and advanced study material.

There is nothing to "read into it". Ra's view is right there in black and white. Here are some quotes for a search for the terms wisdom, compassion, and balance.

What you further provide in your post are general discussions about imbalance/balance between love/compassion and wisdom. What I specifically asked you: do you have any quote where Ra states directly that Ra was guided by folly love/compassion in their attempts to aid this planet in Harvest which was not balanced by wisdom?

Here is my view: in the above they are talking about UFO technology, and then adding that there were many other certain types of aid from Confederation, that are now seen as a folly certain *type of aid*. I interpret it as it is things like initiations, mummifications, nuclear and UFO technology etc, that are now seen to be that kind of aid that has proven to be *unhelpful to increase the Harvest*. I can explain myself and how I think in regards to that other quote too, that you've posted, *if* you are interested. But would you like to explain how you think? What makes you to state that you see an imbalance between love and wisdom?

I agree with you insofar as the forms which the aid had taken- and would add many more. However, the imbalance does not lie within the form, but the intention.

As far as "how I think"- I feel it to be somewhat irrelevant to this discussion which is about what -Ra- thinks. All I am doing is parroting their words.

What Ra thinks is probably that approaching awesome Harvest soon to be made into 7D. (<------------- JOKE!) I think that it is irrelevant to try to figure out what Ra thinks if it is not stated in the material. That is why I asked you - do they state in any specific quote that Ra's aid was an imbalance between love and wisdom when aiding this planet?

However- this result does not reverse the folly of twisting Ra's words in the first place. It doesn't undo the confusion which may have resulted in the minds of others who come across a distorted interpretation of Ra's words, and then use that to reinforce their own distortions, and then propagate them to others through continued discussion in other threads.

I invite you to ponder this, my sister, for often times when others are twisting Ra's words they are doing it out of a perceived need to be "more loving".

Well, perhaps here lies the near-hopelessness that Ra talks about in the attempts to teach? That no matter how clear you can be (and I mean they even took away the unconscious*(see Edit note) mind, and said that they are transmitting information without the distortions) it is still distorted by us? It is kind of sad actually...

Otherwise, I do as you: if someone says something that I believe is distorted or worse, the opposite of what is said in the material, I look up that quote and offer it in the discussion. I realize though that it doesn't matter. People will see what they wish and are ready to see. When student is ready, the teacher will appear. And by teacher I don't only mean the teacher as in the physical form or in form of an advanced material, but more that it could be something in the intelligence of the entity which wakes up, who then start seeing things that were missed before. Perhaps a hunger to study? To stop distorting teach/learnings in order for them to fill the self preconceived, firm beliefs?

Edit: *I wrote unconscious mind, which is a mistake. It should be conscious mind.