12-15-2009, 05:34 PM
I've been studying the thing with the help of a few friends and I now feel I understand it completely... It was in my opinion a rocket.
My understanding is that it was a rocket over the white sea. It malfunctioned outside the atmosphere. There is no friction there, so the exhaust freely moves in whatever direction it is shot, and it is shot out at 4 thousand meters per second. The object can be calculated to be over 250 km wide. Which is why you don't see the rocket. It seemed ridiculous to me for the object to be this size but it means that the exhaust only takes less than a minute to reach the edge from the center. The video of the black hole effect is when the fuel is cut off. Like I said it has no friction so the fuel evacuates the center area at the speed it is shot from the engine. We only have camera shots of this they do not show the whole spiral, but just the most clearly visible center part. Which is why it seems to move even faster than it did.
The reason it is so visible is that it's back lit, it is in direct sunlight while the camera is in the dark.
It took me a while but I figured it out. And it makes absolute sense. It looks much more like a rocket than a projection like haarp would. And who on earth knows what a stargate looks like anyway? Visitors certainly never needed these special effects before. Objects of this size will be visible. If it is a normal side effect of a stargate opening then we'd note ALL stargates opening high up in the atmosphere.
The rocket was not leaking fuel from it's side, it was malfunctioning in another way. This explains the blue spiral, we know it is aluminium oxide. Which has a blue color especially visible when the sun shines on it. And part of the exhaust pipe (Incidentally containing the correct materials) which was at an angle must have received too much heat and just started to evaporate.
If you have any questions out of curiosity or criticism to my story, please ask them I believe I've gone through all of them in the past few days. I could not accept the rocket story until all my objections were answered. But right now they are.
To me personally the most disappointing thing is Wilcocks haarp story. He even called a low light image an infra red image.. Even I can see the difference. I still love the guy to death but this was a blow to my trust it's the first time I've seen him blatantly wrong.
(12-15-2009, 12:29 PM)Peregrinus Wrote: Firstly, rockets do not spew fuel and make pretty light shows. They blow up. Just ask the members of the space shuttle Columbia. No wait, you can't, because their rocket spewed fuel through a tiny o-ring. So, this "rocket" they say spewed fuel all over the place without blowing up... impossible.This rocket did not blow up, When it dropped it's second stage and went into third stage the engine got a hit and was pushed off angle. This did not destroy the rocket because the engine part is built to withstand an enormous amount of vibration and shock. Just not an unexpected blow from the side. It could not be leaking fuel for exactly the reasons you mentioned.
(12-15-2009, 12:29 PM)Peregrinus Wrote: Secondly, when this happened in China in 1988, I guarantee there were no Russian rockets over China. Nothing enters Chinese airspace without an immediate escort, and a rocket over a country such as China would be as good as a declaration of war.So well assume it was a Chinese rocket then?
(12-15-2009, 12:29 PM)Peregrinus Wrote: Thirdly, the crop formation showing such sold me.What did it show? I missed this.
My understanding is that it was a rocket over the white sea. It malfunctioned outside the atmosphere. There is no friction there, so the exhaust freely moves in whatever direction it is shot, and it is shot out at 4 thousand meters per second. The object can be calculated to be over 250 km wide. Which is why you don't see the rocket. It seemed ridiculous to me for the object to be this size but it means that the exhaust only takes less than a minute to reach the edge from the center. The video of the black hole effect is when the fuel is cut off. Like I said it has no friction so the fuel evacuates the center area at the speed it is shot from the engine. We only have camera shots of this they do not show the whole spiral, but just the most clearly visible center part. Which is why it seems to move even faster than it did.
The reason it is so visible is that it's back lit, it is in direct sunlight while the camera is in the dark.
It took me a while but I figured it out. And it makes absolute sense. It looks much more like a rocket than a projection like haarp would. And who on earth knows what a stargate looks like anyway? Visitors certainly never needed these special effects before. Objects of this size will be visible. If it is a normal side effect of a stargate opening then we'd note ALL stargates opening high up in the atmosphere.
The rocket was not leaking fuel from it's side, it was malfunctioning in another way. This explains the blue spiral, we know it is aluminium oxide. Which has a blue color especially visible when the sun shines on it. And part of the exhaust pipe (Incidentally containing the correct materials) which was at an angle must have received too much heat and just started to evaporate.
If you have any questions out of curiosity or criticism to my story, please ask them I believe I've gone through all of them in the past few days. I could not accept the rocket story until all my objections were answered. But right now they are.
To me personally the most disappointing thing is Wilcocks haarp story. He even called a low light image an infra red image.. Even I can see the difference. I still love the guy to death but this was a blow to my trust it's the first time I've seen him blatantly wrong.