12-25-2009, 04:12 AM
(This post was last modified: 12-25-2009, 04:23 AM by Questioner.)
(12-15-2009, 08:09 PM)Peregrinus Wrote: I wish I had great animation skills so I could make a pretty animation of "how the rocket spewed fuel" with realism. What was portrayed in the video did not follow physics of a rocket which had a release of energy with multiple inertia directional influences. This animation showed the continued inertial direction of flight without consideration to the force exerted to the side. I could go on for hours into nitpicking so many things wrong with this.
For those of us who are not rocket scientists or chemical engineers, a few more nitpicks would be helpful for understanding. Could you do some kind of simple sketch with arrows showing the relevant vectors, which would be informative even if it's less than a 3D sequel to Avatar?

(12-16-2009, 08:36 AM)Ali Quadir Wrote: You're clear about your final conclusion. Unless you want to compare notes on various aspects of the phenomenon, I'm going to practice my new found hobby of just letting things be.
Maybe I should try out that hobby as well in the new year.

I want to thank and admire the back-and-forth analysts in this thread for demonstrating such loving graciousness while expressing contrasting opinions. This example might be, for me, a more profound lesson than any facts that could be confirmed about the astronomical event.
(12-16-2009, 01:00 PM)Bring4th_Monica Wrote: The bottom line is that, even if it does meet all the criteria for possibly being a rocket, still does not tell us conclusively what it actually was...since we don't have any way of disproving other phenomena that it possibly could have been.
Monica, I think that it would take more than one punched card to fully express that if-then-else chain in COBOL.

(12-15-2009, 07:20 AM)transiten Wrote: Hello Ali
Well i choose the middle path: HAARPfacility; check David Wilcockand Richard Hoaglands theory [/b]out on Project Camelot, even if you don't like it 100%.
transiten
Would you be willing to post a brief summary of their conclusions here, with a link back to their site for the full article?
(12-15-2009, 05:34 PM)Ali Quadir Wrote: It was in my opinion a rocket.
Do you find the rocket animation video compelling?