Ali Quadir Wrote:Needless to say I'm a little disappointed with David's production. I could not bring myself to read it in depth yet. But I've scanned through it. He's considering all the things I have asked myself and consequently explained as proof beyond doubt that it cannot be a missile. His research was mediocre at best.
Yes. One thing I noticed about David after watching many of his videos and listening to hours of his audio is that he will very consistently explain anything and everything with the most 'far out' explanation possible, dismissing any less fantastic explanation as silly. This is the same type of investigative error that many people make, it is simple close mindedness. If you go in to something with a preset belief in place it is very unlikely that you will find anything else. Oddly, this usually happens on the complete opposite end of the spectrum with so called 'skepical' reporters. But, true skepticism is true open mindedness, not willing to believe anything until having gathered sufficient evidence. Most people that identify themselves as 'skeptics' are in fact cynics.
Bashar explores this in a very poignant youtube video. Please follow this link if you think it will be of value (I certainly do!), but bear in mind that it has nothing to do with The Law of One and lets please not discuss the video specifically here so as to stay inside forum guidelines.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CiQvO5WfcZE
(12-27-2009, 12:05 PM)transiten Wrote: ....but I also know that you put no value in astrology which i have studied and practiced for 20 years and this makes me reluctant to trust in your statements...since i suspect you have not studied astrology in any depth you cannot just dismiss it just like that, you have to study it at least for one year and then come back to discuss the validity of this anscient art with me...
That the display was caused by a rocket and that the display has higher meaning in astrology can both be true. One need not dismiss the other. Our reality is illusory and thus everything takes on meaning, usually in a symbolic fashion. The real question about the spiral light show over Norway is not what or how it was, but why it was.