05-11-2012, 10:17 PM
(05-11-2012, 08:03 PM)omcasey Wrote: Valtor,
Thank you for your feedback.. I am pleased to hear I am coming through more clearly. The male/female example I employed, just to put it to paper, was for the sole purpose clarity; it was felt this example allowed more understanding to come through regarding the capacity for imbalance.
To be very precise, rather than the broad concept of polarity in general, it is the idea of intentional polarization toward either STO or STS for the purpose of graduation that I am interested in. To bring it in even nearer to me, the interest is to whether it is or is not applicable to me in my current situation and state of experience. Then, ultimately, if yes, how so. These last bits are for me to know from within myself. The immediate task - for me - is to come into a fuller understanding and relationship with the concept. Which with the combined help of everyone here I am indeed doing.
with my sincerest appreciation..,
Casey
Consider one of your thoughts, any thought. There are many facets involved in this one thought. This thought could contain memories, biases, projections, persons, etc. These are entities, and these entities are others. From this point, you have a choice of where to direct your service. If to others, you accept these entities as part of you, integrate them, love them, attempt to give them moral support, etc. If to self, you control which entities are allowed into your being, reject them as separate, attempt to push them away, etc.