He Who Was Not

[Lycen]

And thank you for writing, it was interesting to think like it was me typing those words. I shall let the violet signature answer many a thoughts regarding this post. Why just yesterday thoughts regarding how one is to interact with all. As there is no we, me, you, them... as all is one. But how far does one go with this kind of way here, where the illusion is so so thick, and ever present. While typing and speaking I notice words that I am aware of, which separate the "I" to you and them.

I "know" we are all one yet I still separate. The language is made so that there are "others" (a word which I use often I think). Many a time I find my self on a crossroads as to how to say something when language favors separating terms. Sometimes I find the "right" words but at other times I type in the way which separates, leaving an impression like I am not "them" to whom the messages is meant.
Even now I am actually speaking to my self eh? Pretty funny to think about it but yet "someone els" answers. If there is a languages of words which speaks as one, then I am ignorant of it, but even then I think it has to be limited. The amazing feelings and impressions one has gotten in "dreams", are beyond words.

As thus words are for basic communications, a necessity, til one can talk to one without words.
I am not sure what your/my intention with this topic was but these are the thoughts shared by Lycen as one.

PS: Monads.. I am totally not getting what this me was talking about em Its a term I am not that familiar with, but I believe to understand what was meant to be said. Not why, but what.

Monad is from from the Greek Monos meaning "alone" but it's also the term used by Pythagoras to describe the one indivisible source of the All. A monad therefore can be thought of as a single unit, complete in and of itself.

Ah thank you Alexander!