09-11-2012, 08:02 PM
Is the future really a matter of predisposition?
What if as you are typing you have a stroke, and what you would have been predisposed to type never happens?
Also what about the influence of your field causing you to type things that your temporary human form may not be predisposed to even know?
Is that not the whole idea of channeling information from a higher field?
It seems that this process you are speaking of which involves the instantaneous performance of past, present,future, is actually just the natural process of present action becoming past as soon as it occurs. In that instant I realizew there is a blending where present becomes past, but I still do not see how that blending can be applied to events which have not even yet occurred.
Anything can happen in that instant, which means that any number of possible results can occur, but none shall manifest until the event takes place.
That unknown element of possibility is what I refer to as the future.
Am I wrong in assuming that what you are referring to as future is actually just the process of an action taking place in the present, regardless of how instantaneous it is?
There is no event that can take place so instantaneously that it actually becomes the present second in such a way that the endless possibilities are removed by disposition.
as long as any resulting possibility remains unmanifest until the actual occurrence, then that future remains unknown awaiting the occurrence and its result, regardless of how instantly any such thing might happen.
No event can happen with such instance that it supersedes the possibilities/results that various choices of action would have.
I am sensing that this has something to do with what I often refer to as The Process of being, but I am just too confused at this time to put it together.
I still intend to study what you and Azreal are offering here, in much greater depth of thought, and seek to find some aspect fo what you are thinking that might lead me into further understanding.
I am open to learning, and always seek after new information.
But I must be able to comprehend what is offered. If I cannot manage to comprehend it, it simply means that you may have understanding of a matter that is beyond my ability to comprehend.
But I can only work with the tools I am given at this time. So bear with my questions if you would, and don't get caught in the trap of seeing my continual dissecting as arrogance or desire to argue.
I seek knowledge and wisdom.
Would it be wise for me to simply accept anything that is offered to me without thoroughly discerning it? No, and so I will plug away until it becomes obvious that I will not be able to gather what you offer, or until such a time as I finally do come to understand the things you are saying.
What if as you are typing you have a stroke, and what you would have been predisposed to type never happens?
Also what about the influence of your field causing you to type things that your temporary human form may not be predisposed to even know?
Is that not the whole idea of channeling information from a higher field?
It seems that this process you are speaking of which involves the instantaneous performance of past, present,future, is actually just the natural process of present action becoming past as soon as it occurs. In that instant I realizew there is a blending where present becomes past, but I still do not see how that blending can be applied to events which have not even yet occurred.
Anything can happen in that instant, which means that any number of possible results can occur, but none shall manifest until the event takes place.
That unknown element of possibility is what I refer to as the future.
Am I wrong in assuming that what you are referring to as future is actually just the process of an action taking place in the present, regardless of how instantaneous it is?
There is no event that can take place so instantaneously that it actually becomes the present second in such a way that the endless possibilities are removed by disposition.
as long as any resulting possibility remains unmanifest until the actual occurrence, then that future remains unknown awaiting the occurrence and its result, regardless of how instantly any such thing might happen.
No event can happen with such instance that it supersedes the possibilities/results that various choices of action would have.
I am sensing that this has something to do with what I often refer to as The Process of being, but I am just too confused at this time to put it together.
I still intend to study what you and Azreal are offering here, in much greater depth of thought, and seek to find some aspect fo what you are thinking that might lead me into further understanding.
I am open to learning, and always seek after new information.
But I must be able to comprehend what is offered. If I cannot manage to comprehend it, it simply means that you may have understanding of a matter that is beyond my ability to comprehend.
But I can only work with the tools I am given at this time. So bear with my questions if you would, and don't get caught in the trap of seeing my continual dissecting as arrogance or desire to argue.
I seek knowledge and wisdom.
Would it be wise for me to simply accept anything that is offered to me without thoroughly discerning it? No, and so I will plug away until it becomes obvious that I will not be able to gather what you offer, or until such a time as I finally do come to understand the things you are saying.