He Who Was Not

[godwide_void]

And here we are arguing symantics once again and also ignoring the part of my post where I said its possible to use discernment while resonating with large portions of material. Some people aren't skeptical to the point of devil's advocacy.

I am glad the point of that they aren't actually channeling was brought up since I put that term in quotes because there is no word that exists for what they are doing. It isn't their guidance or the Akashek record. It would appear to be unable to be influenced by STS tricksters the same way a computer not connected to the Internet can not get a virus.

While I might not be "channeling" some external entity in the traditional sense, I would like to point out that several of the questions posited to me in my thread are questions concerning topics which I do not have any conscious understanding of and all such responses manifest by means of swift automatic typing with very few pauses occurring. All I will say is that my answers are generated by the subconscious portion of my mind, and a very deep region of it at that which may or may not border on the collective. I am also vaguely aware of the music I am listening to as I type or of the general flowing of the words which flow forth from me, thus I am always in a type of conscious trance state.

I cannot comment on the possible nature of what TheEternal proposes is actually occurring for him and what might actually be occurring for him, but in my case I am able to provide specific information and particular concepts which do not arise in or were molded by my conscious mind, from a source which I have come to directly understand to be my guiding force/information stored within my own higher consciousness.

It is quite fine if zenmaster chooses to view some aspect or the entirety of either Tanner's or my service as utter bullshit, although I was not the one who was directly accused of this, but if I am included in this accusation or am also the target of this skepticism, I would like to humbly point you to the actual tangible and ongoing results of said "channeled bullshit", unless you would consider the answers I gave to specific questions not of a metaphysical nature as a 'rehash of rather banal concepts', although this is actually assuming that this judgement applies to me as well.